2009-03-30

S&P 500 and DJ indices update - 20090330

This is a follow up on the previous posts back in 2008:

What I said back in November 2008 is still basically valid, expect that after the major collapse in the markets, markets are still overvalued, but to a lesser extend than at that time. Back then I said:
There isn't much to say except that the expected massive rally in the $ and the markets happened, and led to a massive overvaluation of the US markets in both absolute terms (in $ terms and PER terms) as in relative terms, compared to the European shares and Gold:
[...]
  • The Dow [...] is over-performing the French index by a massive 18%!
  • The S&P 500 shows the same trend, but with a lower over-valuation.
  • The short US equities - long European ones trade seems more and more appealing. [...]
Today, the overvaluation remains about the same if you count in €-terms: the Dow decline is about 18% less than the CAC40 and the S&P 500 about 15% less. Given the state of the economy in the US and the hundreds of billions of losses by the companies in the US, it's still amazing to see that the French index has declined far more than the US one.


2009-03-29

It's never different this time

Keynesians should know, micro-managing and artificially tweaking the interest rates is dangerous. By tweaking and macro-managing, I mean all the actions done by the Central Banks around the world:
  • debasing the currency,
  • inflating,
  • lower interest rates,
  • printing money,
  • injecting liquidity,
  • creating special alphabet soup to help banks (ask Bernanke what I mean)
  • unfreezing credit markets
All the previous things mean the same: printing money. And printing money does not create wealth but merely reallocates it from the poor to the rich, from the people to the government and corporatocracy.

Believing that a handful of people — however intelligent and bright should they be - could be more clever than the market itself is non-sense.

Anyway, to get back to the main point about this post — It's never different this time — I have been trying to find very old quotes reflecting perfectly what is currently happening. As you will see, everything has happened in the past, to the point where it's actually better to open an history book than read the news (even though I believe it's always better to open a book than read on the news on paper, listen to radio or TV). Here's what I currently have:

About money and debasement:
Even Keynes got some things right!

"Lenin is said to have declared that the best way to destroy the capitalist system was to debauch the currency. By a continuing process of inflation, governments can confiscate, secretly and unobserved, an important part of the wealth of their citizens. By this method they not only confiscate, but they confiscate arbitrarily; and, while the process impoverishes many, it actually enriches some."
John Maynard Keynes

"By this means government may secretly and unobserved, confiscate the wealth of the people, and not one man in a million will detect the theft."
John Maynard Keynes

Nations are not ruined by one act of violence, but quite often, gradually, and almost imperceptibly, by the depreciation of their currency, through excessive quantity”.
Nicolas Copernicus, 1525

"We contend that for a nation to try to tax itself into prosperity is like a man standing in a bucket and trying to lift himself up by the handle."
Winston Churchill

"But if you want to continue to be the slaves of bankers and pay the cost of your own slavery, then let bankers continue to create money and control credit."
Sir Josiah Stamp, president of the Bank of England and the second richest man in Britain in the 1920's, speaking at the University of Texas in 1927

"There is no subtler, no surer means of overturning the existing basis of society than to debauch the currency. The process engages all the hidden forces of economic law on the side of destruction, and does it in a manner which not one man in a million can diagnose."
John Maynard Keynes

"When you recall that one of the first moves by Lenin, Mussolini, and Hitler was to outlaw individual ownership in gold, you begin to sense that there may be some connection between money, redeemable in gold, and the rare prize known as human liberty."
Congressman Howard Buffett

Is there a conspiracy?

"Never ascribe to malice that which is adequately explained by incompetence."
Napoleon Bonaparte

"You can always count on Americans to do the right thing—after they’ve tried everything else."
Winston Churchill

About paper-money


"While I live I will never resort to irredeemable paper."
Napoleon Bonaparte

"Paper money eventually returns to its intrinsic value - zero."
Voltaire, 1729

When will prices rise in result of inflation?
"Significant changes in the growth rate of money supply, even small ones, impact the financial markets first. Then, they impact changes in the real economy, usually in six to nine months, but in a range of three to 18 months."
Milton Friedman

About the Corporatocracy (aka Fascism)
"The proposal of any new law or regulation which comes from [businessmen], ought always to be listened to with great precaution, and ought never to be adopted till after having been long and carefully examined, not only with the most scrupulous, but with the most suspicious attention. It comes from an order of men, whose interest is never exactly the same with that of the public, who have generally an interest to deceive and even to oppress the public, and who accordingly have, upon many occasions, both deceived and oppressed it."
Adam Smith

Why big Government is intrinsically Evil?
"The national budget must be balanced. The public debt must be reduced; the arrogance of the authorities must be moderated and controlled. Payments to foreign governments must be reduced, if the nation doesn't want to go bankrupt. People must again learn to work, instead of living on public assistance."
Cicero, 55 BC

"Government means always coercion and compulsion and is by necessity the opposite of liberty. Government is a guarantor of liberty and is compatible with liberty only if its range is adequately restricted to the preservation of economic freedom. Where there is no market economy, the best-intentioned provisions of constitutions and laws remain a dead letter."
Ludwig von Mises, Human Action

"Giving money and power to government is like giving whiskey and car keys to teenage boys."
P.J. O'Rourke

Any commonality with the US dollar in 2009?
"Until 1922 and the very brink of collapse, Germans and especially foreign investors were absorbing marks in huge quantities. Only the international reputation of the Reichsmark, the faith that an economic giant like Germany could not fail, made this possible. The storage factor caused by the investors willingness to save marks kept the marks from being dumped immediately into the markets, and thereby for a long while held prices in check. The precise moment when the inflation turned sharply upward, toward its vertical climb, was undoubtedly timed by no event, but by the dawning psychological awareness of the German and foreign investor that Germany was not going to back its money. With that, the rush to get out of the mark was on. Like a damn bursting, the seas of marks flooded into the markets and drove prices beyond all bounds. The German government strove mightily to outflood the sea. The sea of marks which had been stored up by Germans and especially by trusting foreigners flooded forth and fought to buy into other investments, foreign currencies, tangible goods, almost anything but marks."
-- Jens O. Parssons, "Dying of Money: Lessons of the Great German & American Inflations"

"We have seen security prices soar out of sight of earnings, brokers' loans swell till they absorb a third of the banking resources of the country, and the blind pools of ancient days return and multiply by endless crossing and pyramiding as the investment trusts of today. Banks merge and emerge in chains, trailing trusts and holding companies, while industrial corporations pay dividends not by producing goods but by buying each others' stocks and by borrowing and lending everybody's money in the market. But of all these things can anyone say with surety what they signify, whether they are safe and sound, or what they are leading to? We do not even know, or cannot agree, whether inflation exists, what it means, or how it shall be measured."
Business Week - September 7, 1929

"For 5 years at least, American business has been in the grip of an apocalyptic holy-rolling exaltation over the unparalleled prosperity of the 'new era' upon which we have entered."
Business Week, 1929

Intervention
"To combat depression by a forced credit expansion is to attempt to cure the evil by the very means which brought it about; because we are suffering from a misdirection or production, we want to create further misdirection- a procedure which can only lead to a much more severe crisis as soon as the credit expansion comes to an end."
Fredrich Hayek, 1933

"In the stock market the more elaborate and abstruse the mathematics the more uncertain and speculative the conclusion we draw therefrom. [...] Whenever calculus is brought in, or higher algebra, you could take it as a warning signal that the operator was trying to substitute theory for experience."
Benjamin Graham

"The length and severity of depressions depend partly on the magnitude of the 'real' maladjustments, which developed during the preceding boom and partly on the aggravating monetary and credit conditions."
Gotfried Haberler, Prosperity and Depression, 1937

Do we need more credit and liquidity?

"We can’t solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we created them."
Albert Einstein

"When a well-packaged web of lies has been sold gradually to the masses over generations, the truth will seem utterly preposterous and its speaker a raving lunatic."
Dresden James

"In a system...where the entire continuity of the...process rests upon credit, a crisis must obviously occur -- a tremendous rush for means of payment -- when credit suddenly ceases and only cash payments have validity. At first glance, therefore, the whole crisis seems to be merely a credit and money crisis."
Karl Marx in Capital

Why won't the Fed allow us to know who it bails out?

"...Secrecy is the keystone of all tyranny. Not force, but secrecy... censorship. When any government, or any church for that matter, undertakes to say to its subjects, 'This you may not read, this you must not see, this you are forbidden to know,' the end result is tyranny and oppression, no matter how holy the motives."
Robert A. Heinlein

"Fascism should more appropriately be called corporatism because it is the merger of state and corporate power."
Benito Mussolini

"If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it. The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie."
Joseph Goebbels

"We are on the verge of a Global transformation. All we need is the right major crisis and the nations will accept the New World Order."
David Rockefeller

"By the mid thirties there was also in existence an advanced demonstration of the Keynesian system. This was the economic policy of Adolf Hitler and the Third Reich. It involved large-scale borrowing for public expenditures, and at first this was principally for civilian works[...]"
John Kenneth Galbraith

"People will believe a big lie sooner than a little one; and if you repeat it frequently enough people will sooner or later believe it."
Adolf Hitler

Why regulation will never ever work
"In a world of businessmen and financial intermediaries who aggressively seek profit, innovators will always outpace regulators; the authorities cannot prevent changes in the structure of portfolios from occurring. What they can do is keep the asset-equity ratio of banks within bounds by setting equity-absorption ratios for various types of assets. If the authorities constrain banks and are aware of the activities of fringe banks and other financial institutions, they are in a better position to attenuate the disruptive expansionary tendencies of our economy."
Hyman Minsky, 1986

"It is incumbent on every generation to pay its own debts as it goes. A principle which if acted on would save one-half the wars of the world."
Thomas Jefferson

"Gentlemen, I have had men watching you for a long time and I am convinced that you have used the funds of the bank to speculate in the breadstuffs of the country. When you won, you divided the profits amongst you, and when you lost, you charged it to the [public] bank. You tell me that if I take the deposits from the bank and annul its charter, I shall ruin ten thousand families. That may be true, gentlemen, but that is your sin! Should I let you go on, you will ruin fifty thousand families, and that would be my sin! You are a den of vipers and thieves."
President Jackson, in 1836, forced the closing of the Second Bank of the U.S. - equivalent to the current Fed - by revoking its charter for their abuses in the issuance of the nation's currency.

"... the dangers of loose fiscal policy were stated as follows: "A democracy cannot exist as a permanent form of government. It can only exist until the voters discover they can vote themselves largess out of the public treasury."
Attributed to the French author, Alexis de Tocqueville

"I am a most unhappy man. I have unwittingly ruined my country."
President Woodrow Wilson (regretting signing into law the Federal Reserve Act)

9/11, the Patriot Act and the War on Terror
"Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."
Benjamin Franklin, 1755

"If tyranny and oppression come to this land, it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy. Of all the enemies to public liberty, war is perhaps the most to be dreaded because it comprises and develops the germ of every other. War is the parent of armies; from these proceed debts and taxes; and armies, and debts, and taxes are the known instruments for bringing the many under the domination of the few. The loss of liberty at home is to be charged to the provisions against danger, real or imagined, from abroad."
James Madison

"We looked into the abyss if the gold price rose further. A further rise would have taken down one or several trading houses, which might have taken down all the rest in their wake. Therefore, at any price, at any cost, the central banks had to quell the gold price, manage it. It was very difficult to get the gold price under control but we have now succeeded. The U.S. Fed was very active in getting the gold price down. So was the U.K."
Eddie George, Bank of England, September 1999

Disclaimer: Most of these quotes are available from this location - I haven't checked their accuracy.

2009-03-28

Eric Mindich's Eton Park goes long gold

After Bill Fleckenstein, David Einhorn and John Paulson (I am not even mentioning long time gold bulls like Marc Faber, Jim Rogers, Peter Schiff or Gerald Celente), yet another legendary hedge fund manager is going long gold on a major way. From a post on MarketFolly:
Mindich received an Economics degree from Harvard and then worked at Goldman Sachs' risk-arbitrage desk. After becoming the youngest partner in the history of Goldman Sachs at the age of 27, it was clear he had a bright future. In 2004, he started his hedge fund Eton Park Capital
[...]
Top 20 Holdings (by % of portfolio)
  1. iShares Emerging Markets (EEM) Calls: 9.37% of portfolio
  2. Wells Fargo (WFC) Puts: 8.38% of portfolio
  3. SPDR Gold (GLD) Calls: 7.64% of portfolio
  4. SPDR Gold (GLD): 7.11% of portfolio

2009-03-27

Gordon Brown: The devalued Prime Minister of a devalued Government

Daniel Hannan, MEP violently criticized Gordon Clown at the European Parliament.
Finally someone with some political courage to speak some truth...

Full transcript here (below also the video):
Prime Minister, I see you’ve already mastered the essential craft of the European politician, namely the ability to say one thing in this chamber and a very different thing to your home electorate. You’ve spoken here about free trade, and amen to that. Who would have guessed, listening to you just now, that you were the author of the phrase ‘British jobs for British workers’ and that you have subsidised, where you have not nationalised outright, swathes of our economy, including the car industry and many of the banks? Perhaps you would have more moral authority in this house if your actions matched your words? Perhaps you would have more legitimacy in the councils of the world if the United Kingdom were not going into this recession in the worst condition of any G20 country?

The truth, Prime Minister, is that you have run out of our money. The country as a whole is now in negative equity. Every British child is born owing around £20,000. Servicing the interest on that debt is going to cost more than educating the child. Now, once again today you try to spread the blame around; you spoke about an international recession, international crisis. Well, it is true that we are all sailing together into the squalls. But not every vessel in the convoy is in the same dilapidated condition. Other ships used the good years to caulk their hulls and clear their rigging; in other words – to pay off debt. But you used the good years to raise borrowing yet further. As a consequence, under your captaincy, our hull is pressed deep into the water line under the accumulated weight of your debt We are now running a deficit that touches 10% of GDP, an almost unbelievable figure. More than Pakistan, more than Hungary; countries where the IMF have already been called in. Now, it’s not that you’re not apologising; like everyone else I have long accepted that you’re pathologically incapable of accepting responsibility for these things. It’s that you’re carrying on, wilfully worsening our situation, wantonly spending what little we have left. Last year - in the last twelve months – a hundred thousand private sector jobs have been lost and yet you created thirty thousand public sector jobs.

Prime Minister, you cannot carry on for ever squeezing the productive bit of the economy in order to fund an unprecedented engorgement of the unproductive bit. You cannot spend your way out of recession or borrow your way out of debt. And when you repeat, in that wooden and perfunctory way, that our situation is better than others, that we’re ‘well-placed to weather the storm’, I have to tell you that you sound like a Brezhnev-era apparatchik giving the party line. You know, and we know, and you know that we know that it’s nonsense! Everyone knows that Britain is worse off than any other country as we go into these hard times. The IMF has said so; the European Commission has said so; the markets have said so – which is why our currency has devalued by thirty percent. And soon the voters too will get their chance to say so. They can see what the markets have already seen: that you are the devalued Prime Minister of a devalued government.

2009-03-26

The UK getting closer and closer to collapse

Just two days ago, the official CPI figure in the UK came up at 3.2% and both Mervyn King and Gordon Brown where surprised by the numbers. I must admit that it's very surprising that with a currency that's been devalued by about 25% against the Euro and the US Dollar and 50% against the Yen in the past 18 months, plus having M3 figures skyrocketing by about 40% annualized, only the complete idiot and absolute incompetent must be surprised to see prices rise. When you think that the CPI figures are probably way understating what is actually going on in the country, you get somehow a bad feeling about the future of the GBP. From my own experience as a shopper, prices have been rising by much more than just 3%...
March 24 (Bloomberg) -- The U.K. inflation rate unexpectedly rose in February after higher food costs and the weakness of the pound sustained price pressures even as Britain’s recession deepened.

Consumer prices climbed 3.2 percent from a year earlier, the Office for National Statistics said today in London. The median forecast of 28 economists was for 2.6 percent.
Worse, those three idiots (you shall not forget about Alistair Darling!), think that decreasing prices will soon resume and that they must hence inflate even faster and harder.
Bank of England Governor Mervyn King wrote in a letter to the Treasury explaining the increase from the 3 percent limit that a “sharp decline” in the rate is likely to resume.

Chancellor of the Exchequer Alistair Darling replied that he welcomes King’s approach of looking through temporary effects on inflation, which officials say may be volatile because of the currency’s drop.
[...]
“February’s inflation outturn is somewhat higher than expected,” King wrote to Darling. “It is likely that over the next year CPI inflation will move below target, although the profile of inflation could be volatile.”

The Bank of England has to do whatever is necessary to get Britain away from disinflation, policy maker David Blanchflower said yesterday.
So much stupidity is beyond imagination. It can exist only in the real world.

But just when you think you are seeing light at the end of the tunnel, it looks like the light is the train coming fast and that avoiding a complete wreckage is almost impossible. It also shows one more time that trying to micro-manage the economy is bound to failure because of the law of unintended consequences, that I have been talking about in the past:
March 26 (Bloomberg) -- [...] For the first time in almost seven years, the U.K. couldn’t find enough buyers for one of its debt sales when it offered 1.75 billion pounds ($2.55 billion) of bonds yesterday. The yield on 10-year gilts rose after the sale by as much as 20 basis points
[...]
Gilts have “only one buyer and that’s Mervyn King,” said John Anderson, a money manager who oversees about $3 billion in pound-denominated assets at Rensburg Fund Management in London. “You don’t need to look anywhere beyond that. Make your mind up, please, government. Do you want to buy gilts or do you want to sell them? You can’t do both.”
A couple of past posts that might be worth reading again:
(Full disclosure: I have been massively short the GBP for about a month)

2009-03-24

The meltdown should have surprised no one

This is a great 1 hour and 20 minute monologue by Peter Schiff. I am amazed how well and structured he is when talking for as long as 80min with no interruption. Many interesting things and of course lots of reasons why the meltdown should have surprised no one.

Watch from the Mises.org web site or below:

John Paulson goes long gold

An interesting report I had missed on AlphaVille:
This statement was released by Anglo American on Tuesday afternoon:
Anglo American announces the sale of its remaining 11.3% shareholding (39,911,282 shares) in AngloGold Ashanti Limited to investment funds managed by Paulson & Co Inc for $32.00 per share in cash, generating proceeds of $1.28 billion.

Here’s AngloGold’s chief executive Mark Cutifani on Paulson’s investment:
"Following Anglo American’s final selldown I’d like to welcome Paulson & Co. as one of AngloGold Ashanti’s largest shareholders. As the world deals with the global economic crisis the value of gold, as the only true "hard currency", is coming to the fore as evidenced by the investment choices of some of the world’s most seasoned investors," AngloGold Ashanti Ltd. Chief Executive Officer Mark Cutifani said. "We’re extremely pleased that someone with John Paulson’s track record and reputation has chosen AngloGold Ashanti as one of his investments through which to increase his exposure to the gold market. The Anglo American share overhang, with its depressing effect on our share price, has now gone and I’m excited about the opportunities that lie ahead for us."

The US find some hope in China's cluelessness

As stupid as it may sound, China is stating that they will keep on buying US Treasuries:
March 23 (Bloomberg) -- China’s top foreign-exchange official said the nation will keep buying Treasuries and endorsed the dollar’s global role, supporting the U.S. as the Obama administration increases spending to revive growth.

Treasuries form “an important element of China’s investment strategy for its foreign-currency reserves,” Hu Xiaolian, director of the State Administration of Foreign Exchange, said at a briefing in Beijing today. “We will continue this practice.”
Haven't they expressed their worries as early as last week about the solvency of the US and the short, medium and long term depreciation of the USD?

Hasn't China been requesting the US to stop their reckless policies and debasing their currency?
Wen called March 13 for the U.S. “to honor its promises and to guarantee the safety of China’s assets.”

China was “worried” about its holdings of Treasuries, he said at a press conference after the annual meeting of the legislature, the National People’s Congress.

Yu Yongding, a former adviser to the central bank, said Feb. 10 that the nation should seek guarantees that its Treasury holdings won’t be eroded by “reckless policies.”
What was the US official reply? Just a few days after the Chinese request, the Fed announced they will print $1.3 trillion more dollars. This is just twice the total holdings of the Chinese government and 10% increase in the monetary base. That's also what is called a 10% devaluation of the dollar.

Even more troublesome is this statement published on the official web of the Chinese Central Bank (reported by MarketWatch):
[...] the Chinese government said it wants a global reserve system controlled by the International Monetary Fund, The Financial Times reported. The goal is to create a global reserve currency that is divorced from individual nations and is able to "remain stable in the long run, thus removing the inherent deficiencies caused by using credit-based national currencies," Zhou Xiaochuan, governor of the People's Bank of China, was quoted by the newspaper as saying. Zhou's remarks were posted in a paper posed in English and Chinese on the country's central bank's Web site.
How clueless are the central bankers of China? A global reserve currency, divorced from individual nations and their inherent deficiencies already exists: it's called Gold. And once you have that currency, why do you want it controlled the IMF, which is as foolish, reckless and Keynesian as the Fed? WHY? The solution exists, it's cost effective, it's nobody's liability, it's just to buy gold and keep it in their vaults at the central bank.

The good news for the US is that they have some complete fools on the other side of their trades, so they can just drive the Chinese bankrupt with their printing presses and maybe get themselves some oxygen while looking for their next target...

2009-03-23

Saving the auto-industry in the US

A couple of reports this week-end on Bloomberg start to make people realize that there's more than bottomless hole for the US Government to throw money: there's the financial industry, the housing industry which is now really some sort of hedge-fund industry with Freddie and Fannie being in the middle and finally, the 3rd place on the podium: the auto-industry.
March 19 (Bloomberg) -- U.S. auto suppliers will get as much as $5 billion in U.S. Treasury aid to avoid a collapse that would cripple the domestic industry, including federally funded General Motors Corp. and Chrysler LLC.
[...]
“This is not going to save every supplier because there is still a significant amount of overcapacity, but if we can protect those suppliers that are in this situation because of the difficult market environment, that’s the key,” said Wall, the CSM analyst.

Senator Carl Levin, a Michigan Democrat, called Treasury’s action “good news,” saying a strong supplier base is critical to maintaining a domestic auto industry.
[...]
GM and Chrysler, which are operating on $17.4 billion in government loans, are seeking as much as $21.6 billion in additional aid.

March 21 (Bloomberg) -- General Motors Corp. and Chrysler LLC may need “considerably” more than the $21.6 billion in aid they requested, which was based on optimistic recovery plans, said Steven Rattner, the Treasury’s chief auto adviser.

President Barack Obama’s auto task force is assessing proposals from GM and Chrysler to decide whether to recommend U.S. assistance or tip the carmakers into bankruptcy. Rattner made the comments yesterday on Bloomberg Television’s “Political Capital with Al Hunt,” airing this weekend.
I would to emphasize these facts:
  • US automakers have been consistently losing money for the past 5-6 years, while the economy was "booming". How do you expect that a single injection of money will avoid the collapse?
  • US automakers have been unable to produce cars that people actually want to buy, for the past 5-6 years. Capitalism, Darwinism, expects these companies to just shut down. But yet again, even if you give them money, how do you expect them to be able to reverse course within a couple of months while they have failed to so for many years in a row?
  • US automakers are now burning government funds instead of their own personal money (and that of the shareholders). So what is the incentive for them here? What do they have to lose? This is the very definition of the planed economy that was tried in USSR. We all the know what happened to them, because it's history, and we all know what will happen to the US carmakers, because it's never different this time.
  • Not so many people in the mainstream media dared to say that the auto-makers would come back and ask for more money, but many non-Keynesian bloggers did....
Finally, I wanted to share this quote with you — just try to guess what X represents:
The lobbies of Congress are crowded with representatives of the X industry. The X industry is sick. The X industry is dying. It must be saved. It can be saved only by a tariff, by higher prices, or by a subsidy. If it is allowed to die, workers will be thrown on the streets. Their landlords, grocers, butchers, clothing stores, and local motion picture theaters will lose business and depression will spread in ever-widening circles. But if industry X by prompt action of Congress is saved — ah then! it will buy equipment from other industries ; more men will be employed; they will give more business to the butchers, bakers, and neon-light makers and then it is prosperity that will spread in ever-widening circles.
Economics in One Lesson, Henry Hazlitt, 1946. Henry Hazlitt is a great economist of the Austrian School of Economics and has written this great yet very simple book which I recommend to everybody wanting to understand the way of thinking in Austrian Economics.

Here's an excerpt from the conclusion:
But the result of this subsidy is not merely that there has been a transfer of wealth or income, or that other industries have shrunk in the aggregate as much as industry X has expanded. The result is also that capital and labor are driven out of industries in which they are more efficiently employed to be diverted to an industry in which they are less efficiently employed. Less wealth is created. The average standard of living is lowered compared with what it would have been.


You can buy the book for $12 at the Mises.org institute, read it online here. I've also found an old scanned version here.

Citi Pandit told Congress compensation was $1 Million but bank filing shows $10.8 Million

Mish, via Huffington Post, via Reuters shows:
Citigroup Chief Executive Vikram Pandit received nearly $11 million of compensation in 2008.

A month earlier, he testified to Congress that his compensation for 2008 was just $1 million.

"My compensation for the year 2008 was my salary, which was $1 million," he told the House Committee on Financial Services on February 11, failing to mention his sign-on and retention awards, as well as stock and option awards.

At the same hearing, Pandit pledged to accept a salary of just $1 a year and no bonus until Citibank once again posted a profit.

The $10.82 million in total compensation for 2008 consisted of $7.73 million in sign-on and retention awards, a $958,333 salary, $9.84 million of stock and option awards and $16,193 of other compensation.

According to Crain's New York Business, Pandit originally was paid $40 million, not $11 million, but lost a significant bulk of the money when the stock tumbled, recently dipping to below $1 a share.
Please also have a read at this previous post: Citi CEO Vikram Pandit Says "Pigs Can Fly"

2009-03-20

Marc Faber is growing hashish in Thailand

This is a great interview of Marc Faber on Bloomberg (available on YouTube) where he talks about various subjects. The two points that stuck me are the following:
  • He sees war and terrorism as the way out of the current crisis as irresponsible gouvernment are not willing to take drastic measures and let the market clear out...
  • He is growing hasish in this farmlands in Thailand. Check the video at about 5min25.
"We have some farmlands in New Zealand, and obviously there, we don't grow hasish. But in the north of Thailand, I have some lands and we grow some good stuff.
- Good stuff?
- Yes good stuff. It makes you very happy."

Good work Marc!




2009-03-19

Bernanke doing his best to crash the US dollar

It's a known fact for any reader of this blog that I have the lowest possible esteem for such an incompetent and financial terrorist like Ben Bernanke. Here are just a few of the past posts dealing with this sick person who also happen to have the IQ of a goldfish and whose integrity is as low as the Bush family (grand-father, father and W) and Hank Paulson:
So, Mr Bernanke and his friends from the Fed have decided to increase their balance sheet by more than $1.3 trillion, providing liquidity to unfreeze the credit markets. All these technical words are nothing but BS. It simply means that the Fed is going to print $1.3 trillion and hand it to some banks in exchange for their valueless CDOs and other ABS and MDS - the stuff that are now called toxic assets but which were rated by S&P or Moody's with the same AAA-rating than the debt of the US government. Notice that maybe they just meant that the US Government debt is as low quality as these toxic assets? :-)

Here's the market reaction to this decision. Does this chart look familiar?
There are nonetheless three very interesting things that emerge from this madness and the violent reaction that followed on the market:
  1. Markets failed to forecast this move and to "price" this devaluation in advance. So much for all the people who believe in market efficiency and forward looking...
  2. Long term treasuries (20 and 30 years) jumped big time (bringing the yield to lower levels) on the prospect that the Fed will by them at high price. But what the market failed again to understand is that Bernanke announced "only" $300 billion of treasuries purchases. This is a ridiculously small amount compared to the $1.5 trillion quarterly "expected" deficit of the Obama administration (expected means that they have underestimated the figures big time).
  3. This announce will have unintended consequence and Bernanke is likely to regret it sooner than later because it will be the perfect opportunity for the US creditors (mainly China and Japan) to sell their US Tresuries back the Fed, cash in a huge amount of valueless USD paper and convert it into real assets such as oil, gold, silver? Will they take their chance? It's not impossible in my opinion. Now suppose that the FMI jumps in and offers to sell their gold in order to sink the gold market. Well, China might actually decide to buy their whole gold reserves after selling their Treasuries. Wouldn't be convenient?
I am quite sure that selling the USD and the Treasuries will become two very crowded trades and that in the end, both will collapse. The Fed cannot prevent both of them from collapsing anyway. The only thing it can do, is make the USD collapse even faster by trying to support the Treasuries. This would be completely stupid, but it looks like stupidity is the way to go at the Fed.

Finally, let's have a good laugh courtesy of Bloomberg:
Economist Richard Hoey said Bernanke has created the “Rambo Fed,” referring to the Sylvester Stallone character skilled with weapons.

“This is a very powerful and aggressive move,” Hoey, chief economist at Bank of New York Mellon Corp., said in an interview with Bloomberg Television. “One of the reasons I’ve been arguing we won’t have a depression is we’ve got a Fed chairman who understands the problem and is going to come with the right diagnosis and the right medicine.”
I prefer laughing when I read so much nonsense, because on the long run we are all dead — said Keynes, the dead corpse that brought us into such reckless policies.

2009-03-18

Relief rally and dead cat bounce in the markets

It's amazing to see such a powerful rally in this market, and again, the most amazing part is how much financials are rallying, most of them being up between 100% and 200%.

This is good for my portfolio, as I previously stated that I messed up my delta-hedging which resulted in a poor performance in Feb.

Oil is up as well, hitting a three-month high, and the USD and treasuries are a bit down.

But on thing I want to emphasis here is: do not get caught into believing this big fat liar and incompetent Bernanke who is talking up the markets. Mish has done a very good post about his interview.

These kinds of rally do not occur at bottoms and we are still seeing very high valuations in stocks and bonds. One simple way to know if we're facing a sucker rally is to see if it is lead by the financials. And it is...

The other thing to notice is that all the very bad news that are being reported every day for the past 10 days are simply just ignored by the market, which keeps on rallying. This is not a sign of complete capitulation of the markets, but testifies of greedy behavior, which is quite the opposite of what you'd be looking for at bottoms. I would expect good news to be ignored and market slowly declining in low volumes as a testimony of hitting the bottom.

I won't expect the bottom to be V-shaped anyway, but rather U-Shaped or actually even L-Shaped.

For those who want to read a very interesting study of bear markets, I would recommend getting a copy of Anatomy of the Bear by Russell Napier. It's a fantastic work, even if at many occasions, he seems to be supporting the idea that the Fed should be doing more, to help the markets, etc. The Fed should be banished.

2009-03-14

Switzerland starts competitive devaluation

After Japan, the USA, the UK, Canada, the Eurozone, and Switzerland having all their interest rates at 0.5% or below, it's difficult for them to do anything but Quantitative Easing (lingo word to say: set the printing presses to full speed).

A decade ago, Japan started QE with disastrous results. Last week, the UK started QE and we are certain the result is going to be far worse than Japan. The USA — the Fed — has been thinking about doing it for quite some time but has been taken over by the SNB — the Swiss National Bank — which has hence taken the 3 position in the competitive devaluation of the currency.

Try to guess the exact moment they devalued on this chart:

March 12 (Bloomberg) -- The Swiss central bank cut its interest rate close to zero and started buying foreign currencies to stem the franc’s appreciation as the recession sharpens and deflation looms.

The franc plunged the most against the euro since the single currency was introduced in 1999 after the Swiss National Bank in Zurich lowered its main lending rate to 0.25 percent from 0.5 percent. The SNB also said it would buy corporate bonds as well as currencies in its first solo intervention in foreign exchange markets since 1992.
Intervening on the markets to sink their own currency has a name: devaluation.

This is the reason why I never bought Swiss Francs as a safe haven, because I knew their Central Bankers are as mad as Ben Bernanke and Mervyn King. For those who still believe the Swiss Franc is better than the USD or the GBP, I suggest you read Gold Wars, The Battle Against Sound Currencies as seen from the Swiss Perspective by Ferdinand Lips. It's a fantastic book.

All these countries believe that the faster they devalue their currency, the better it is. Not only devaluation is not a solution but an additional burden on their citizen, but even worse, when everybody wants to devalue, it becomes a competitive process. The result being probably several inflationary bust to come sometime in the next 3-5 years.

I will keep on buying gold and silver as there's no way rates are raised in the next several years. The only solution politicians see is devaluation and printing until all the 25-30 years mortgages are erased.

2009-03-13

China warns the US - 1st official warning

Chinese official have finally given their first official warning to the US about their worries as creditor to an insolvent nation and their fears of devaluation of the US dollar and the default on their debt. This follows two semi-official warning that I covered here:
Hopefully, the things will get tense enough that the US will stop printing and borrowing. Printing and borrowing is not the solution!
March 13 (Bloomberg) -- China, the U.S. government’s largest creditor, is “worried” about its holdings of Treasuries and wants assurances that the investment is safe, Premier Wen Jiabao said.

“We have lent a huge amount of money to the United States,” Wen said at a press briefing in Beijing today after the annual meeting of the legislature. “Of course we are concerned about the safety of our assets. To be honest, I am a little bit worried. I request the U.S. to maintain its good credit, to honor its promises and to guarantee the safety of China’s assets.”

China should seek to “fend off risks” as it diversifies its $1.95 trillion in foreign-exchange reserves and will safeguard its own interests, Wen said. Chinese investors held $696 billion of U.S. Treasuries as of Dec. 31, an increase of 46 percent from the prior year.
Hopefully, the end of the tunnel is near. Chinese should be buying gold, silver, oil, and also companies in various countries instead of valueless paper (currencies and debt).

2009-03-12

ECB Stealthly Approaches Zero Rates

I have already mentioned a couple of times last year that Trichet is no political courage and that he had abdicated from its duties which are very simple as they fit in one single statement: protect the value of the €. He has one task, and he has yet managed to miserably fail.

So basically, this is the third episode to this series, the first two ones being:
So basically Trichet has an issue: he cannot simply stick to his own words. Every time he says something, he does the opposite a few weeks later. He has constantly said that he won't decrease rates, yet he has actually decreased them substantially for the past several months. But here is the final straw:
March 12 (Bloomberg) -- European Central Bank President Jean-Claude Trichet’s new weapon to battle the recession is taking him closer than it seems to zero interest rates.

Trichet is allowing the ECB’s deposit rate, which lenders earn on overnight deposits with the central bank, to usurp the benchmark refinancing rate and become the main driver of short- term borrowing costs. At just 0.5 percent, the deposit rate matches the Bank of England’s key setting and is only a step away from the zero-to-0.25-percent range the Federal Reserve uses.
[...] The deposit rate is “very, very low,” Trichet said three times in an hour at a press conference on March 5.

The ECB’s decision to offer banks unlimited amounts of cash, announced on Oct. 8, has culminated in the deposit rate setting the new de facto cost of short-term money. The measure removed the need for banks to borrow in the money market to meet their reserve requirements.
[...]
Trichet hasn’t ruled out further rate cuts. The ECB has “not decided ex-ante that the present level was the lowest,” he said during a press conference in Vienna today. Still, “we are at very low rates.”
[...]
The ECB has cut its main refinancing rate by a total of 2.75 percentage points since early October.
[...]
That is allowing Trichet to argue “that the ECB does not have such a different monetary-policy stance from the Fed and Bank of England,” said Gilles Moec, an economist at Bank of America Merrill Lynch in London.

Guilty? Madoff is the world's wealthiest selfmade man — beyond Bill Buffet and Bill Gates

The media are spreading everywhere Madoff's word and as usual forget to analyse anything, repeating and spreading seems to be enough for all the people blinded by the Matrix and enslaved by debt and inflation.

So, here is how I see this whole story:
  • Madoff has been robing his clients for the past 20 years, living extremely largely without having anything to do but pretend everything was fine.
  • When he reaches 70 years old, the markets collapse.
  • Being an old but clever man, he knows clients will redeem, and he cannot repay.
  • He has diverted about $65 billion, that is $65,000,000,000 — bigger than the whole wealth of Warren Buffett or Bill Gates, making him actually the world wealthiest man.
  • He transfers all this money into hidden accounts, letting only his wife and children know how much and where.
  • He asks the children to denounce him, protecting them this way. "Sons, I am an old man, denounce me, keep all the wealth, and live happily ever after."
  • He sets up a huge play — the persecution — where he pleads guilty and tells the whole world how sorry and ashamed he is, but will nonetheless not reveal what he has done with the money. Since he is pleading guilty, he has no obligation of revealing anything.
  • Media just repeat the guilty and sorry part of the speech and forget about the biggest robbery of the entire history, and Madoff's family is now one of the richest families in the world.
Here's one article, trimmed of all the blabla which still contains valuable information. Emphasis mine:
NEW YORK Saying he was "deeply sorry and ashamed," Bernard Madoff pleaded guilty Thursday to pulling off perhaps the biggest swindle in Wall Street history and was immediately led off to jail in handcuffs to the delight of his seething victims. Madoff, 70, could get up to 150 years in prison when he is sentenced in June.
[...]
The plea did not satisfy many investors who had hoped Madoff would be forced to name any family members or others who helped him swindle them out of billions of dollars. He pleaded guilty to all 11 charges against him — with no deal with prosecutors — meaning he is under no obligation to disclose names and tell authorities where the money went. He is not believed to be cooperating with prosecutors.

"I am actually grateful for this opportunity to publicly comment about my crimes, for which I am deeply sorry and ashamed," Madoff, speaking softly but firmly, said in his first public comments about his crimes since the scandal broke in early December.

The fraud, which prosecutors say may have totaled nearly $65 billion, turned a well-respected investment professional — he was once chairman of the Nasdaq exchange — into a symbol of Wall Street greed amid the economic meltdown.

Madoff pleaded guilty to charges including fraud, perjury and money-laundering, telling the judge that the scheme began in the early 1990s, when the country was in a recession and the market was not doing well.
[...]
Madoff implicated no one else, though investigators suspect relatives and top lieutenants — perhaps Madoff's wife — may have been in on the scheme.

Welcome to the real world.

Tax receipts collapse by 17% in the US

As expected, US national debt is skyrocketing as the expenses keep on rising (and Obama is going to make it a lot worse...) while tax receipts will be collapsing due to big losses in all the industries and joblessness reaching historical high levels.

Again, all these have been forecast on this blog and by other students of the Austrian Economics School of thought and the budget deficits are going to make things a lot worse, contrary to the crazy beliefs of the Keynesians...

CalculatedRisk points to the following report on MarketWatch:
The U.S. federal government budget widened to $192.8 billion in February as tax receipts plunged to the lowest level in 14 years, the Treasury Department reported Wednesday. It's the second largest monthly deficit on record, exceeded only by $237.2 billion gap in October. For the first five months of the fiscal year, the deficit has increased by a half trillion dollars to a record $764.5 billion. Outlays were flat compared with a year earlier at $280.1 billion, while receipts dropped 17% to $87.3 billion, the lowest since February 1995. In February, individual income taxes fell 64% to just $8.7 billion. That's the lowest monthly total for individual income taxes since May 1985.

2009-03-10

Citi CEO Vikram Pandit says "Pigs can fly"

So, Vikram Pandit said today that his bank is having the best quarter since 2007, when it last posted a profit.

“I am most encouraged with the strength of our business so far in 2009,” Pandit wrote in an internal memorandum obtained today by Bloomberg. “We are profitable through the first two months of 2009 and are having our best quarter-to-date performance since the third quarter of 2007.”

Unfortunately, Bloomberg — which I usually recommend and is usually very precise on their reports — didn't finish their sentence. Mish points to this article which complements Bloomberg's:
Based on historical revenue and expense rates, Citi's projected earnings before taxes and one-time charges would be about $8.3 billion for the full quarter.

Pandit declined to say how large credit losses and other one-time items have been that would at least partially offset profit.
Right, so the company is making profits if you exclude the losses! That's quite convenient. So, is Vikram Pandit a big fat liar? Should the SEC do something? Is there a pilot in the plane?

Now, having a look at this report (cheers M. Denninger!), I think it's easy to guess that the Vikram is indeed — for the least we can say — trying to motivate his people...
Citibank, Bank of America , HSBC Bank USA , Wells Fargo Bank and J.P. Morgan Chase reported that their "current" net loss risks from derivatives surged to $587 billion as of Dec. 31. Buried in end-of-the-year regulatory reports that McClatchy has reviewed, the figures reflect a jump of 49 percent in just 90 days.
[...]
Four of the banks' reserves already have been augmented by taxpayer bailout money, topped by Citibank — $50 billion — and Bank of America — $45 billion , plus a $100 billion loan guarantee.
The banks' quarterly financial reports show that as of Dec. 31 :
— J.P. Morgan had potential current derivatives losses of $241.2 billion , outstripping its $144 billion in reserves, and future exposure of $299 billion .
— Citibank had potential current losses of $140.3 billion , exceeding its $108 billion in reserves, and future losses of $161.2 billion .
— Bank of America reported $80.4 billion in current exposure, below its $122.4 billion reserve, but $218 billion in total exposure.
— HSBC Bank USA had current potential losses of $62 billion , more than triple its reserves, and potential total exposure of $95 billion .
— San Francisco -based Wells Fargo , which agreed to take over Charlotte-based Wachovia in October, reported current potential losses totaling nearly $64 billion , below the banks' combined reserves of $104 billion , but total future risks of about $109 billion.
So where does the truth lies? No one knows. Why? Because nobody is willing to force the banks to open their books and show what they are hiding. Why? Probably because the losses far exceed their capital and that would cause a complete meltdown. But the meltdown cannot be avoided, it can only be postponed and that's what Henry Paulson, Bernanke, Geithner, Bush, and Obama are doing: buying time.

Anyway, the one sure thing is that every market bounce led by the financial is yet another bear market rally for the foreseeable future. So when you see shares of Citi, BofA and other bounce as much as 36% in one session, you know: it's not over yet. The market being currently quite oversold after a brutal drop, not so many people are willing to sell their long or short the market at all. So the bounce could last for some time. If the markets bounce enough, it could be the opportunity many are waiting for closing their positions, and the opportunity I am looking for to short it.

2009-03-09

Pedge Fund Performance 200902

Just a quick post to relate the performance of PedgeFund for the month of February 2009. January 2009 and 2008 returns are available here.

Summary:
Pedge Fund USD
February performance: -9.1% (gross, approx)
Year to Date performance: -2% (gross, approx)

Highlights:
  • Big losses on Oil related commodities and stocks
  • Gains thanks to the precious metals (long gold and silver)
  • Losses short USD
  • Gains on short treasuries
  • Gains on Puts on the Dow. I have some puts for quite some time, and bought more a few weeks ago, but unfortunately, I made a mistake: when buying out of the money puts, I didn't properly delta-hedge my portfolio and hence the put ended up making far less gains than the overall losses on the portfolio, as noticed on the performance of the portfolio this month.
I said last month that "Feb will be a difficult month and it's likely that such gains are not going to hold..." and it appears that I was right! I am not happy with this delta-hedging error, which caused the portfolio to be down while I was accurate on my forecast. March seems to have started on a negative note, but I expect the rebound on Oil to continue and precious metals to rebound...

On the other informative news, I friend of mine asked me if I could manage his money, since I have avoided him a lot of losses in the past several months, and that all my calls happened to be right. So I will do my best to onboard his money into the fund, which will require me to be a lot more structured in the way I work...

David Einhorn is buying gold to bet against central banks

Interesting report on the FT. David Einhorn is a very talented hedge fund manager and I have been following the news on his fund for quite some time. I am glad to see that he is bullish on gold as well.
Hedge fund investors who made money last year by betting against investment banks are now buying gold as a way of betting against central banks.

The gold bulls include David Einhorn, founder of hedge fund Greenlight Capital, who last year came under the spotlight for his short selling of shares in Lehman Brothers, after arguing that the bank did not have enough capital to offset its exposure to falling property prices. Other funds looking at gold include Eton Park and TPG-Axon, investors said.
[...]
Investors such as Mr Einhorn are turning to gold because they are worried about the response of the US Federal Reserve and other central banks to the global economic crisis. A bet on gold is essentially a bet against all paper currencies.

“The size of the Fed’s balance sheet is exploding and the currency is being debased. Our guess is that if the chairman of the Fed is determined to debase the currency, he will succeed,” Mr Einhorn wrote in a recent letter to his investors. “Our instinct is that gold will do well either way: deflation will lead to further steps to debase the currency, while inflation speaks for itself.”
[...]
Peter Munk, chairman of Barrick Gold, the world’s largest miner of bullion, told investors last week that [...] “The only option to governments is to print and print more money,” he said. “That will end in tears.”

Bomb targets Citibank Branch in Athens

March 9 (Bloomberg) -- A bomb exploded outside a branch of Citigroup Inc.’s Citibank north of the Greek capital, Athens, early today, Agence France-Presse reported, citing an unidentified police official.
As forecast for quite some time, sadly, violence is becoming more and more mainstream. Unfortunately, I do not see any other way out of the current crisis, as people are being robbed blind by the very same people who they elected and whose duty are to protect them. Noticing that their condition is getting worse and worse, not understanding what is going on, but seeing the huge wealth transfer from the state to the banks, they will take it to the streets. Voting doesn't matter anymore, since the same liars end up with the power. You can call them fascists, communists, far-left wing, far-right wing, but these dangerous people are going to be seen as the only different point of view and will get more and more support — with all the dangerous consequences that this implies...

Previous posts of interest:
2009-02-26 Civil unrest in the US in the next few years
2009-03-03 Civil Unrest in the UK this summer?

GBP to be devalued by 50%-70% within next 6-12 months

I have read a very scary report about the intentions of Gordon Brown, Alistair Darling and Mervyn King. It is now given that they will pursue the target of an inflationary collapse in the UK instead of trying to solve the problem.

Here are some details quoted from a JPMorgan report:
  • The BoE has embarked upon the most aggressive programme of QE in the industrialized world, creating base money to finance Gilt and private asset purchases worth 10% of GDP (and with no guarantee it will stop there).
  • The BoE’s asset purchase programme will likely push growth in the monetary base to 115% by May and 205% by late summer, comfortably exceeding growth in the US (93%) and Euro area (39%). The UK money base will grow nearly six times faster than it did in Japan under the BoJ’s QE policy.
  • All central banks are pursuing unconventional monetary policies now but the BoE is pushing the boundaries further than others, encompassing the de facto monetisation of the fiscal deficit.
Some other interesting information can be found on MarketWatch.

Also worth a read:
March 6 (Bloomberg) -- The British government will boost its stake in Lloyds Banking Group Plc to 75 percent in exchange for insuring 260 billion pounds ($367 billion) of toxic assets, two people familiar with the plan said.
Of course, this confirms that the UK is finished and that one must be crazy to hold any GBPs. I have sold half of my GBPs last Friday, and will sell the remaining probably within a week or two. Next step is to stell GBP short in order to hedge my salary against the coming collapse.

Also note that the US$ currency base is growing at the atronomical rate of 93% and that even in the Euro area, the growth is 39%, which is a crazy crazy rate of growth... ... but this still means that the € should raise against the USD and GBP.

The mega printing of currency in all developed and developing economies is of course very bullish for precious metals and commodities.

2009-03-06

$500 billion bail-out for the FDIC to come

Just two days ago Sheila Bair rejected arguments that the agency should use government aid to rebuild the fund:
“Banks, not taxpayers, are expected to fund the system,” Bair said. Asking for taxpayer support “could paint all banks with the ‘bailout’ brush.”
Today:
WSJ -- Senate Banking Committee Chairman Christopher Dodd is moving to allow the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. to temporarily borrow as much as $500 billion from the Treasury Department.

The Connecticut Democrat's effort -- which comes in response to urging from FDIC Chairman Sheila Bair, Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke and Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner -- would give the FDIC access to more money to rebuild its fund that insures consumers' deposits, which have been hard hit by a string of bank failures.

The bail-out nation might be headed for an inflationary bust more quickly than the other economies...

2009-03-05

Nothing but lies from Bernanke, Paulson, and Geithner

I have seen the news and cannot put in a better way than Mish, so I'll just use his phrasing and share completely his opinion.

This is a follow up of the three following posts:
Fed Refuses to Release Bank Lending Data, Insists on Secrecy
The Fed refused yesterday to disclose the names of the borrowers and the loans, alleging that it would cast “a stigma” on recipients of more than $1.9 trillion of emergency credit from U.S. taxpayers and the assets the central bank is accepting as collateral.

Bloomberg sued Nov. 7 under the U.S. Freedom of Information Act requesting details about the terms of 11 Fed lending programs.

On Oct. 25, Bloomberg filed another request, expanding the range of when the collateral was posted. It sued Nov. 7.

In response to Bloomberg’s request, the Fed said the U.S. is facing “an unprecedented crisis” in which “loss in confidence in and between financial institutions can occur with lightning speed and devastating effects.”

Fed Chairman Ben S. Bernanke and then Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson said in September they would meet congressional demands for transparency in a $700 billion bailout of the banking system.
Mish: In plain English: Bernanke Lied.

Pressure to reveal major AIG counterparties grows
Calls increased Tuesday to reveal the financial institutions that got almost $40 billion in collateral from American International Group shortly after the government first bailed out the insurer last year.

AIG almost collapsed in September after ratings agency downgrades triggered demands for billions of dollars in extra collateral from firms that had bought derivative-based protection from the insurer on complex mortgage-related products known as collateralized debt obligations, or CDOs.

AIG didn't have that much money and faced bankruptcy. But it was saved by an $85 billion emergency loan facility from the Federal Reserve.

By Nov. 5, the insurer had paid out $37.3 billion of that money to counterparties who had purchased a certain type of derivative-based protection from AIG called multi-sector credit-default swaps, according to the company's third-quarter regulatory filing.

"AIG has given the counterparties $20 billion. Those people could be just about anybody in the world. Why won't the Fed disclose who those are?" Sen. Ron Wyden, D-Ore., asked Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke during congressional testimony on Tuesday.

Bernanke said the counterparties made "legal, legitimate, financial transactions" with AIG and presumed at the time that the contracts would remain private. "That is a consideration we have to take into account," he added.

Sen. Mark Warner, D-Va., suggested that AIG's counterparties should have to take a "haircut," rather than be made whole, because some of them probably didn't do enough due diligence on whether the insurer was financially strong enough to be selling such protection.

"In effect, what we're saying is, consequently, folks who bought these instruments and that, at some point in their process, should have been doing some level of credit analysis of what AIG was selling who didn't do that credit analysis are going to still come out whole for their lack of appropriate due diligence or responsible behavior," he said.

"I'm as unhappy as you are about that, senator," Bernanke replied. "I just don't know what to do about it."
Mish:
There are many problems with the handling of AIG but it all starts with the initial decision to do something as opposed to nothing. Government has no business bailing out anyone and the decision is made all the more galling by making everything a secret.

Note that the Fed is picking winners and losers. There are other creditors of AIG who might have a better claim on its assets than who the Fed is picking. Remember that the Fed promised transparency. Instead, we have gotten noting but lies and secrecy from Bernanke, Paulson, and Geithner every step of the way.

Words cannot begin to express my disgust of the lies and secret shenanigans of the Fed and Treasury.

Bill Fleckenstein: Defend yourself with Gold

In his latest column of the Contrarian Chronicles series, Bill Flickenstein (yet another of the few money managers I highly regard) gives his explanation about why the price of gold has been declining last week and why this should be just temporary: short selling. He recommends buying Gold to protect yourself against government money-printing presses.
The funding problem is, however, a reason to own gold, as gold is the only defense against the money-printing press. Not that the gold market was too worried about the printing press last week.

I thought it might be worth making a couple of points about gold, given the rout it suffered last week. As gold dropped 8% (roughly $80 per ounce), the key gold exchange-traded fund, SPDR Gold Shares, saw no liquidation. But the double-short ETF ProShares UltraShort Gold experienced record volume.

Thus, the recent decline in the price of gold has been precipitated by some combination of short-selling in the gold ETF (where the short interest has been rising quite aggressively) and/or the short-selling and liquidation of gold futures.

Those of us who believe gold belongs in one's portfolio need to remember that the folks who don't like it really don't like it. After all, gold is easy to hate.

[...] there's quite a contingent that wants to bet against gold. However, those doing so have every government of the world fighting against them, in the form of printing money.

Meanwhile, the physical market continues to show signs of people wanting to exchange their colored pieces of paper for gold. Interestingly, Brinks said Wednesday that it had been seeing "a large spike in clients shipping gold and silver" from the New York Mercantile Exchange and Commodity Exchange, or Comex, over the past few months.

Thus the battle continues. Folks need to be aware that gold will remain volatile. But I don't believe the run in gold will be over for quite some time. Gold has been rising sort of quickly for eight years, and I expect it should continue to do so.

FDIC's insurance fund about to be insolvent

It's an interesting story again... instead of letting failed companies fail, the US Gov has decided to bail them out. And soon, the entities that protect and the others that bail out are going to become and insolvent (provided they aren't already!). So the USA and the FDIC might be already insolvent and once this become a known fact, the whole dollar system will collapse...
March 4 (Bloomberg) -- Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. Chairman Sheila Bair said the fund it uses to protect customer deposits at U.S. banks could dry up amid a surge in bank failures, as she responded to an industry outcry against new fees approved by the agency.

“Without these assessments, the deposit insurance fund could become insolvent this year,” Bair wrote in a March 2 letter to the industry. U.S. community banks plan to flood the FDIC with about 5,000 letters in protest of the fees, according to a trade group.

“A large number” of bank failures may occur through 2010 because of “rapidly deteriorating economic conditions,” Bair said in the letter. “Without substantial amounts of additional assessment revenue in the near future, current projections indicate that the fund balance will approach zero or even become negative.”

The FDIC last week approved a one-time “emergency” fee and other assessment increases on the industry to rebuild a fund to repay customers for deposits of as much as $250,000 when a bank fails. The fees, opposed by the industry, may generate $27 billion this year after the fund fell to $18.9 billion in the fourth quarter from $34.6 billion in the previous period, the FDIC said.

The fund, which lost $33.5 billion in 2008, was drained by 25 bank failures last year. Sixteen banks have failed so far this year, further straining the fund.

Smaller banks are outraged over the one-time fee, which could wipe out 50 percent to 100 percent of a bank’s 2009 earnings, Camden Fine, president of the Independent Community Bankers of America, said yesterday in a telephone interview.
[...]
“The FDIC realizes that these assessments are a significant expense, particularly during a financial crisis and recession when bank earnings are under pressure,” Bair wrote. “We did not want to impose large assessments when the industry and economy are struggling. We searched for alternatives but found none better.”
[...]
Bair rejected arguments that the agency should use government aid to rebuild the fund. The FDIC has authority to tap a $30 billion line of credit at the Treasury Department and legislation pending in Congress would boost the amount to $100 billion.

“Banks, not taxpayers, are expected to fund the system,” Bair said. Asking for taxpayer support “could paint all banks with the ‘bailout’ brush.”

The FDIC “will revise the interim rule, if appropriate, in light of the comments received,” the agency said in a Federal Register notice.

2009-03-04

GBP arbitrage opportunities gone, replaced by very high inflation

I made a post about how it was possible to do arbitrage in late December by buying products in the UK instead of the Eurozone since the retailers had not updated their prices to reflect the collapse of the pound:
GBP arbitrage opportunities

Apple has updated their desktop computers range, and here are the price changes:
  • MacMini jumped from £391 to £499 (+27.6%)
  • iMac jumped from £782 to £949 (+21.3%)
  • MacPro jumped from £1712 to £1899 (+10.92%)
Many items on Amazon.co.uk have also had a major price increase.

Well, these arbitrage opportunities are almost all gone now, meaning that prices have jumped by about 20% in the UK for many products in just a matter of 2 months. You can thank Mervyn King, Alistair Darling and Gordon Brown. This also confirms my theory that you will have rising prices in this environment and that whoever thinks that we are a deflationary environment and that prices are going to collapse might be more wrong than right...

Look at the screenshots here and compare them to those from the original post. I can tell you one thing: I see similar trends when I go do my grocery shopping in the supermarkets!




2009-03-03

$1 trillion Bailout for US public pension funds to come

This is the scary story of the fraud which have been going on the US pension funds for the past 10 to 15 years, and the trillion dollar bail-out that might be required to have the current generations retirement paid by the next generation. The US, land of freedom, land of justice, land of opportunities!

Yet another great report on Bloomberg. Keep up the good work!
March 3 (Bloomberg) -- The Chicago Transit Authority retirement plan had a $1.5 billion hole in its stash of assets in 2007. At the height of a four-year bull market, it didn’t have enough cash on hand to pay its retirees through 2013, meaning it was underfunded to the tune of 62 percent.
[...]
Public pension funds across the U.S. are hiding the size of a crisis that’s been looming for years. Retirement plans play accounting games with numbers, giving the illusion that the funds are healthy.

The paper alchemy gives governors and legislators the easy choice to contribute too little or nothing to the funds, year after year.

The misleading numbers posted by retirement fund administrators help mask this reality: Public pensions in the U.S. had total liabilities of $2.9 trillion as of Dec. 16, according to the Center for Retirement Research at Boston College. Their total assets are about 30 percent less than that, at $2 trillion.

With stock market losses this year, public pensions in the U.S. are now underfunded by more than $1 trillion.

That lack of funds explains why dozens of retirement plans in the U.S. have issued more than $50 billion in pension obligation bonds during the past 25 years -- more than half of them since 1997 -- public records show.
The quick fix for pension funds becomes a future albatross for taxpayers.

In the CTA deal, the fund borrowed $1.9 billion by promising to pay bondholders a 6.8 percent return. The proceeds of the bond sale, held in a money market fund, earned 2 percent -- 70 percent less than what the fund was paying for the loan. The public gets nothing from pension bonds -- other than a chance to at least temporarily avoid paying for higher pension fund contributions. Pension bonds portend the possibility of steep tax increases.

By law, states must guarantee public pension fund debts. [...] With the recession that started in December 2007, cities and states are running huge deficits [...]. The economic downturn gives state legislatures another reason to cut back on funding pensions.

[...] Fund accountants [...] set unrealistically high expected rates of return to reduce governments’ annual contributions. And they use smoothing techniques to paper over investment reverses so they make losing years look like winners [...] which can delay governments catching up with losses for more than a decade.

This ruse can pass the buck to future taxpayers, who will pay for the retirement benefits of today’s government workers.
[...]
The Teacher Retirement System of Texas, the seventh-largest public pension fund in the U.S., reports each year that its expected rate of return is 8 percent. Public records show the fund has had an average return of 2.6 percent during the past 10 years.

The nation’s largest public pension fund, California Public Employees’ Retirement System, has been reporting an expected rate of return of 7.75 percent for the past eight years, and 8 percent before that, according to Calpers spokesman Clark McKinley. Its annual return during the decade from Dec. 31, 1998, to Dec. 31, 2008, has been 3.32 percent, and last year, when markets tanked, it lost 27 percent.
[...]
A government retirement plan can’t go bankrupt, even if it’s insolvent; state treasuries must put up the money if a fund runs dry.
[...]
Actuaries consistently permit public pension funds to report artificially high expected rates of return -- most often 8 percent and as much as 8.75 percent. That’s more than the 6.9 percent billionaire investor Warren Buffett sets for his Omaha, Nebraska-based Berkshire Hathaway Inc.’s pension fund.

“Public pension promises are huge and, in many cases, funding is woefully inadequate,” Buffett wrote in his 2008 letter to shareholders. “Because the fuse on this time bomb is long, politicians flinch from inflicting tax pain, given that the problems will only become apparent long after these officials have departed.”

New Jersey Governor Jon Corzine, a former co-chief executive officer of Goldman Sachs, has proposed allowing government pension funds to put off half their pension contributions because of the state’s growing deficit during the recession.

Corzine’s suggestion follows a recent New Jersey pension track record of mistakes. When the state’s pensions were healthy in the 1990s, the state legislature eliminated nearly all of its annual pension contributions for almost a decade, while adding $4.6 billion of benefits.

New Jersey sold $2.75 billion of pension bonds in July 1997. Then-Governor Christine Todd Whitman said at the time that the bonds would save taxpayers $47 billion and make the system fully funded.

“You’d be crazy not to have done this,” Whitman said in a Bloomberg News interview in June 1997. “It’s not a gimmick. This is an ongoing benefit to taxpayers.”

New Jersey’s pension bonds haven’t saved taxpayers $47 billion. To date, the state has lost more than $500 million on those bonds, according to state records.

Civil Unrest in the UK this summer?

I have already mentioned many times that I expect civil unrest and revolutions to happen during the next few years in many countries. Last time was last week and in the US and various other countries.

It seems more and more likely that it is going to happen in the UK quite soon. Here's a quote from the previous post:
And here's some more news for the UK, in the Gardian(read the full report for more details):
Britain faces summer of rage - police
Middle-class anger at economic crisis could erupt into violence on streets
Police are preparing for a "summer of rage" as victims of the economic downturn take to the streets to demonstrate against financial institutions, the Guardian has learned.

Britain's most senior police officer with responsibility for public order raised the spectre of a return of the riots of the 1980s, with people who have lost their jobs, homes or savings becoming "footsoldiers" in a wave of potentially violent mass protests.

The Express also has a report on "banks riots" (found on MacroMan's blog):
TOP secret contingency plans have been drawn up to counter the threat posed by a “summer of discontent” in Britain.

2009-03-02

The predictable failure of Gruebel as CEO of UBS

Let's make a bold call. I would like to make very very early in the process, so that it's irrefutable when it's going to happen sometime in the future: New CEO Gruebel will fail turn around UBS.

But first some background:
Feb. 26 (Bloomberg) -- UBS AG hired Oswald Gruebel to replace Marcel Rohner as chief executive officer, tapping the veteran banker who turned around Credit Suisse Group AG, to restore investor confidence eroded by record losses and a U.S. tax scandal.

The 65-year-old Gruebel takes over immediately from Rohner [...]. UBS shares soared 16 percent after the appointment of Gruebel, who returned Credit Suisse to profitability in 2003 and has been retired for two years.

Gruebel “comes with an impressive track record,” said Andreas Weese, an analyst at UniCredit SpA in Munich who has a “hold” rating on UBS. “This should calm some investors’ nerves.”
[...]
A former bond trader, Gruebel doubled profit at Credit Suisse between 2004 and 2006 before retiring in 2007. [...]
“Oswald, or Saint Ossi as the Swiss call him, is credited with the turnaround of Credit Suisse after the Winterthur debacle,” said Dirk Hoffmann-Becking, an analyst at Sanford Bernstein & Co. “The markets would expect him to perform similar miracles on UBS as well.”
So here are my points. Hopefully, they will be proven right within the next 24 months:
  • CEOs in general are human, and they are most of the time more into internal political games than anything else and they are most of the time less capable than the average joe.
  • CEOs in general cannot transform lead into gold. A company that is a failure cannot be transformed into a success story, no matter how good the CEO. The only mega transformation that I know was the Apple resurgence brought by Steve Jobs, but he is a real genius, and he brought in all the work accomplished for many years at NeXT.
  • John Thain, the other "miracle man" on Wall Street has created a precedent that is going to be difficult to ignore
  • Vikram Pandit, yet another "miracle man" on Wall Street has create yet another precedent that is going to be difficult to ignore.
  • The so-called miracle that Gruebel supposedly performed at Credit Suisse happened between 2003 and 2006, which was the biggest credit bubble in history and also one of biggest bull markets for banks. So what he probably did was ride this rally. What's the probability of him just being the person who was at the right place at the right time?
So the only way UBS can be turned around is in my opinion with the help of huge bailouts (already happened a few months ago and probably still happening as I write this) and big part of luck. Let's see how lucky Gruebel is :-)