Showing posts with label Lies. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Lies. Show all posts

2012-10-27

US Government to Spent $1 Trillion on F-35 Fighters — That's More Than Australia's GDP

Nobel Piece Prize Laureate Obama, who also happens to be the US President who wages the most wars in history and attacked civil liberties the most, is now to spent $1 trillion on F-35 fighters. The Atlantic is reporting:
The Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning II is an impressive aircraft: a fifth generation multirole fighter plane with stealth technology. It's also a symbol of everything that's wrong with defense spending in America.
[...]
The F-35 is designed to be the core tactical fighter aircraft for the U.S. military, with three versions for the Air Force, Navy, and the Marine Corps. Each plane clocks in at around $90 million.
In a decade's time, the United States plans to have 15 times as many modern fighters as China, and 20 times as many as Russia.

So, how many F-35s do we need? 100? 500?  Washington intends to buy 2,443, at a price tag of $382 billion.

Add in the $650 billion that the Government Accountability Office estimates is needed to operate and maintain the aircraft, and the total cost reaches a staggering $1 trillion.
In other words, we're spending more on this plane than Australia's entire GDP ($924 billion).

The F-35 is the most expensive defense program in history, and reveals massive cost overruns, a lack of clear strategic thought, and a culture in Washington that encourages incredible waste.

Money is pouring into the F-35 vortex. In 2010, Pentagon officials found that the cost of each plane had soared by over 50 percent above the original projections. The program has fallen years behind schedule, causing billions of dollars of additional expense, and won't be ready until 2016. An internal Pentagon report concluded that: "affordability is no longer embraced as a core pillar."

2012-10-21

Reality Starts To Settle In

Except in the banking where the GAAP and Mark to Market seem to have been suspended forever; it seems like reality is finally starting to show up.

See for yourself:
  • Apple is down $100 from its peak a few weeks ago.
  • This is the second consecutive quarter in which sales have shown signs of deterioration. Likewise, with company’s net income experiencing a shortfall, this ends its streak of year over year profit growth, which spanned four quarters. As disappointing as these numbers were, they weren’t all that surprising, as the Street had anticipated weakness in IBM’s hardware business, which fell 12% from the year ago quarter. (source)
  • Google shares plummeted as much as $79.49 per share and CNBC immediately devoted their entire coverage for hours on end to the Google pre-report. The reason for the drop had to do with Google missing by a mile on both the top and bottom lines due to a slowdown in advertising, a fourth consecutive cost-per-click decline, and a whopping $151 million loss from its Motorola Mobility purchase. Pretty much every concern I've listed over the past month or so regarding Google came to light during this report. Tablet sales are hurting Google's ad margins. No defined mobile ad platform is in place yet (source)
  • Intel posted relatively soft numbers earlier this week, largely in part to overall weakness in the broader PC market, longtime partner-in-crime Microsoft (Nasdaq: MSFT  ) is following suit with its own uninspiring figures ahead of one of its most important product launches in years.
  • AMD shares settled lower by 16.8%. (source)
  • Marvell Technology slid 14.3% after lowering its third quarter guidance.
Yet, sentiment doesn't seem to be affected much - the VIX is higher, but not in anyway showing any fear, and bullish news flow seem to be unabated:
On the other hand, even banks show that they are reaching the limits of falsification and accounting massages, and shareholders are also showing signs of exhaustion, as Vikram Pandit realised recently. See the massive gap between the losses shareholders had to endure, and the personal profits of Mr. Pandit, which undoubedtedly is perhaps one of worst CEOs ever, but also one of the best con man ever:

(Bloomberg) Citigroup will have paid him about $261 million in the five years since he became CEO, including his personal compensation and about $165 million for buying his Old Lane Partners LP hedge fund in 2007 in a deal that led to his becoming CEO. The bank shut Old Lane soon after Pandit took the post, causing a $202 million writedown.
During the 5 year period where Pandit increased his personal wealth by $261 million (gross), shareholders have lost 91% of their capital. Well done!

2012-10-02

Obama, the Friendliest President to Banks and Big Oil in History

Nobel Peace Prize laureate, President Obama, has been out-bushing Bush on every account; and; while he is on track for a second mandate, it's important to note that:
  • he has been waging more wars than any other presidents in the past, W Bush included
  • he has been attacking civil liberties more than any other presidents in the past, W Bush included - in case you forgot, he renewed Guantanamo, the Patriot Act, and also create the shiny new Preventive Detention act.
  • he has been spending more than any other presidents in the past, with a yearly budget deficit always above $1 Trillion
  • he has been, contrary to all impressions, the friendliest President to banks and big oil in history. And I'm not the one saying this latter one:
(Yahoo) The polls suggest President Obama will be re-elected. While there's a legend surrounding the 1980 election when Ronald Reagan overcame a huge poll deficit in September of 1980, the truth says otherwise. 
The reality is a sitting President polling as highly as Obama is now is all but certain to regain the White House. Scott Bleier, the founder of Create Capital, visited Breakout to debunk another bit of conventional wisdom. "Obama has been the friendliest President to banks and big oil in history," he states in the attached video. "Wall Street secretly loves Obama." 
Bleier doesn't intend to make a political statement. His point is that markets have blasted off under Obama at the hand of "free money" from the Federal Reserve. While the Fed and Executive Branch are supposedly independent of one another, Wall Street believes it. Certainly the Fed's recent decision to launch another round of Quantitative Easing, triggering a quick 2% rally did nothing to belie these suspicions. "Obama's a shoe-in unless the market crashes two weeks before the election," says Bleier. "This guy's got it locked up."
But I'm sure none of Obama's supporter care for this a minute. Simple minds or ideologists who believe that "this time will be different" will always get crushed.

2012-09-11

Peak Confidence in, Peak interventionism by Central Banks

The interventions of the past 4-5 years are really incomparable with anything in the past 70-80 years and the era of modern, fiat based, Central Banking. These John Laws of modern time have had no result to show for their massive amounts of printing except for enormous debt loads on the sovereign balance sheet of their countries.

Yet, it seems that money printing is the cure for many seemingly totally unrelated issues. Indeed, printing money:
  • Creates jobs
  • Creates economic growth
  • Saves currencies
  • Saves political unions
  • Improves exports
  • Put here whatever you like, money printing will do it for you.
To be honest, one must really have a critical mind to be able to see through most of these urban legends perpetrated by mainstream media and parrot journalists for decades. The still, one of these stands out as the most inept statement ever; yet people seem to believe in it, it's the one about printing an unlimited amount of Euros to save the Euro. The fact that the whole world is still buying into the ever increasing amount of lies and non-sense coming out of the mouth of lunatic central bankers is very telling about the overall sentiment of the market.

Moreover, the amount of intervention done in the past few months alone is so gigantic and its scale so much beyond imagination that it is completely unsustainable going forward, even for a short period of time. Yet, in spite of all this, "inflation", defined as the growth of overall money and credit, is not happening in those economies (namely, in the UK, the EU, the US and Japan).

We have reached what I would like to call the peak confidence in, and peak interventionism by, Central Banks from where there's only one way ahead: disappointment and reduction of interventions:
  • Bernanke Options to Stimulate Growth Include Open-Ended QE Plan
  • Fed Stuck at Zero Into 2015 Seen in Swaps, QE Odds Reach 99%
  • Draghi Lured by Fractious EU Leaders to Build Euro 2.0
  • Draghi Says Officials Agree on ECB Unlimited Bond-Buying 
  • Draghi Told Lawmakers ECB Must Buy Bonds for Euro’s Survival
  • Mario Draghi’s Big Moment, Continued - ECB to "do whatever it takes"
  • SNB’s Franc Defense Swells Reserves to 71% of GDP
  • SNB’s $380 Billion Pile Makes Jordan Wonder

All these plans will come crashing down to the earth, and most of those expecting the Fed doing QE and the ECB buying bonds will be sourly disappointed. I have already been through the reasons before; and the fact that the Central Bankers are talking the markets up without intervening will end up badly for those who believed the lies.

In addition to my previous posts here are quotes from Graham Summers who writes a great newsletter at GainsPainsCapital.com:

Super Mario's Big Bluff
The financial world has entered a new state of mania with the announcement by the ECB that it will engage in "unlimited" bond buying to maintain lower interest rates for trouble EU sovereigns.

As you no doubt know, our firm's forecast was that the ECB would not engage in any large-scale bond purchasing programs.

We maintain this view today regardless of the ECB's announcement. The reason? The ECB stated very clearly that new bond purchases would only be made under strict conditions. Those conditions involve:
  1. Applying for a bailout from the EFSF
  2. Meeting fiscal budget requirements
  3. Implementing major spending cuts and various other austerity measures
  4.  
[...] Let's cut through the BS here. The use of the word "conditions" completely negates the word "unlimited." Saying that you'll buying "unlimited" bonds as long as EU sovereigns meet certain "conditions" actually means nothing.
[...] The ECB says it will buy EU sovereign bonds if EU nations apply for bailouts from the EFSF. Spain and Italy (the very countries that need bailouts) are meant to supply 30% of the EFSF's funding.
So this new program involves Spain and Italy bailing themselves out, while simultaneously implementing austerity measures so the ECB will buy their sovereign bonds?!?!
Oh, and by the way, the EFSF only has €65 billion in funding left. That will definitely be enough to bailout Spain and Italy, seeing as Greece has received over €200 billion in bailouts is still imploding.
What's the Fed Going to Do?
Today we turn our attention to the US's Federal Reserve where the whole world expects the Fed to announce QE 3 at its FOMC meeting this Wednesday and Thursday.
There is a small problem of math with this. The Fed currently owns all but just $650 billion of the outstanding 10-30 year Treasuries. At this point, even a $200-300 billion QE program would create serious liquidity problems for the financial system. So scratch that idea off the list.
Of course, the Fed could potentially implement another agency/MBS QE program. But that would be a very political move with the Presidential election so close. This, combined with current food and energy prices, makes it unlikely the Fed would want to do this: too many consequences with too little to gain (stocks are at four year highs).
Indeed, if anything, the Fed is likely to pull a "ECB" move, namely promising something vague that it actually cannot deliver on. Why would the Fed do this? Because, like the ECB, the Fed is running out of bullets. Indeed,  St Louis Fed President James Bullard all but admitted this to the Financial Times:
"I am a little - maybe more than a little bit - worried about the future of central banking," said James Bullard, president of the Federal Reserve Bank of St Louis, in a Financial Times interview at Jackson Hole. "We've constantly felt that there would be light at the end of the tunnel and there'd be an opportunity to normalise but it's not really happening so far."
The biggest worry on display at Jackson Hole was whether these bureaucrats, sitting at the heart of every mature economy, still have the power to influence demand now that interest rates cannot fall much further. Lurking behind many debates was this question: if central bank policies are so effective, why is the global economy not growing faster?
Here's a Fed official, not only openly admitting that Fed policies aren't working, but even calling the future of Central Banking into question. Take note: underlying realities are beginning to be asserted by officials at Central Banks around the globe. They're running out of bullets.
So where does this leave us? Well, it's highly unlikely the Fed will actually implement anything major this week. What we could see is a large, but hollow promise for action, much like the ECB's promise of "unlimited" bond purchases based on certain "conditions" being met (an empty promise if ever there was one).
Finally, see for yourself some quotes from various reports listed above which I have collected over past few weeks.

Bernanke Options to Stimulate Growth Include Open-Ended QE Plan
Federal Reserve Chairman Ben S. Bernanke, who last month defended his unorthodox monetary policies, has a new tool at hand should he seek one to a revive a flagging economy and labor market: open-ended bond buying.
Barclays Plc forecasts the Federal Open Market Committee this week will announce monthly purchases of $50 billion to cut the jobless rate while holding inflation at 2 percent. Economists at Goldman Sachs Group Inc. (GS) and BNP Paribas, responding to last week’s report of slowing job growth, also say they expect an announcement of an open-ended plan on Sept. 13 after a two-day FOMC meeting.
The Fed’s practice of specifying an amount and an end-date for purchases has resulted in abrupt withdrawals of stimulus that later was renewed after the central bank failed to reach its goals. By contrast, an open-ended program would tie purchases to a sustained improvement in the economy, said Michael Gapen, senior U.S. economist at Barclays and a former member of the Fed Board’s Division of Monetary Affairs.
“As a Fed chairman, 2 percent growth isn’t doing it for you, 8 percent unemployment isn’t doing it for you -- they need a faster acceleration,” said Gapen, who is based in New York. “So, the decision is, ‘OK, let’s hit the pedal.”
Fed Stuck at Zero Into 2015 Seen in Swaps, QE Odds Reach 99%
Just six months ago, money market traders expected the Federal Reserve to raise interest rates by the end of 2013. Now, they see borrowing costs staying at record lows for about three more years as the economic outlook worsens.
Bond market measures from overnight index swaps, which indicate no rise in the federal funds rate until mid-2015, to a 62 percent decline in a measure of volatility in government bonds signal that rates will stay near zero for longer. The gap between two- and five-year Treasury yields, which decreases when traders expect benchmark rates to remain subdued, is more than 50 percent narrower than its average since 2008.
Investor expectations for sluggish growth and low inflation remain intact even though the collapse of Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc., which triggered the worst financial crisis since the Great Depression, happened four years ago. While the economy expanded in the second quarter, the unemployment rate remained above 8 percent for the 43rd-straight month in August.
“The problems have been bigger than anticipated and it will take a while to work our way through these issues,” Larry Dyer, a U.S. interest-rate strategist in New York with HSBC Holdings Plc’s securities unit, said in an interview on Sept. 6. “The bond market is pricing in pretty close to a very prolonged period of low growth,” said Dyer, whose firm is one of the 21 primary dealers that trade with the central bank.
 Draghi Lured by Fractious EU Leaders to Build Euro 2.0
The European Union’s 19th crisis summit was winding down when European Central Bank President Mario Draghi made an unusual request. He wanted some alone time with EU President Herman Van Rompuy to thank him for charting the path toward a shock-proof euro zone.
Only later did the significance of the blueprint sketched out at the June summit in Brussels emerge. The commitment to tighter bank supervision, budget coordination and a nebulous “political union” was instrumental in persuading Draghi that governments are putting the currency on a sounder footing, leading to yesterday’s ECB decision to buy bonds to help them get there.
Draghi Says Officials Agree on ECB Unlimited Bond-Buying
European Central Bank President Mario Draghi said policy makers agreed to an unlimited bond- purchase program as they try to regain control of interest rates in the euro area.
The ECB needs to be in a position to ensure the transmission of its rates in all euro-area countries, Draghi said after the ECB held its benchmark rate at a record low of 0.75 percent.
“We will have a fully effective backstop to avoid destructive scenarios with potentially severe challenges for price stability,” Draghi said at a press conference in Frankfurt today.
Draghi has staked his credibility on the bond plan, telling lawmakers in Brussels this week that the ECB needs to intervene to wrest back control of rates in a fragmented euro-area economy and save the single currency. Now it’s up to governments such as Spain and Italy to trigger ECB bond purchases by requesting aid from Europe’s rescue fund and signing up to conditions.
“Governments must stand ready to activate” the rescue fund in bond markets when needed “with strict and effective conditionality,” Draghi said.
The ECB reserves the right to terminate bond purchases if governments don’t fulfil their part of the bargain, Draghi said.
Purchases will be fully sterilized, meaning that the overall impact on the money supply will be neutral, he said.
Draghi Told Lawmakers ECB Must Buy Bonds for Euro’s Survival
European Central Bank President Mario Draghi said the bank’s primary mandate compels it to intervene in bond markets to wrest back control of interest rates and ensure the euro’s survival.
Mounting his strongest case yet for ECB bond purchases, Draghi told lawmakers in a closed-door session at the European Parliament in Brussels yesterday that the bank has lost control of borrowing costs in the 17-nation monetary union. Bloomberg News obtained a recording of his comments, some of which were published by Italian news agency AGI yesterday.
“We cannot pursue price stability now with a fragmented euro area because changes in interest rates affect only one country, or two countries at most,” Draghi said. “They have no importance whatsoever in the rest of the euro area.” ECB bond purchases are therefore “a way to comply with our primary mandate,” he said, adding: “Frankly, all this also has to do very much with the continuing existence of the euro.”
The Frankfurt-based ECB referred to the closed-door format of the hearing and did not provide any further comment. Draghi’s comments come two days before the ECB’s Governing Council is due to decide on his bond-buying proposal, expectations for which have already driven down yields in Italy and Spain. In the testimony, Draghi rebuts arguments that bond purchases stretch the central bank’s mandate.
“Do we give up our primary mandate for maintaining price stability?” he said. “It’s exactly the opposite situation.”
Mario Draghi’s Big Moment, Continued
Europe emerges from its summer torpor with untapped disasters in waiting.
On Thursday, attention turns to Mario Draghi, the president of the European Central Bank, and the plans, if any, he will announce to help manage the European Union’s financial crisis. Next, on Sept. 12, Germany’s constitutional court will rule on the legality of the European Stability Mechanism, the euro area’s new permanent bailout fund, and the fiscal pact that curbs government deficits. If either event goes badly, watch out.
In July, Draghi aroused expectations that he has so far been unable to meet when he promised the ECB would do “whatever it takes” to defend the euro system. This was seen as a pledge of unlimited bond buying aimed at lowering the long-term interest rates that Spain, Italy and other distressed sovereign borrowers must pay.
SNB’s Franc Defense Swells Reserves to 71% of GDP
The Swiss central bank’s foreign- currency reserves surged to a record in July as the euro region’s increasing turmoil forced policy makers to step up their defense of the franc ceiling.
Switzerland’s cash pile swelled 11.3 percent in the month to 406.5 billion Swiss francs ($420 billion), the Swiss National Bank said on its website today. That pushed holdings to 71 percent of gross domestic product. Walter Meier, an SNB spokesman in Zurich, said “a large part” of the increase resulted from currency purchases to defend the minimum exchange rate.
SNB President Thomas Jordan has pledged to enforce the franc ceiling of 1.20 per euro “with unlimited purchases of foreign currencies if needed.” The central bank implemented the cap in September to fight deflation and help exporters. Its reserves have soared 44 percent since the end of that month, according to SNB data calculated to International Monetary Fund standards.
“The SNB can keep its pace of interventions for a pretty long time unless there is a massive disruption like the collapse of the euro area,” said Maxime Botteron, an economist at Credit Suisse Group AG (CSGN) in Zurich. “As they increase liquidity through their purchases, the only limiting factor is inflation. However, that is not a concern at the moment."
SNB’s $380 Billion Pile Makes Jordan Wonder
Swiss central bank President Thomas Jordan is wondering how to invest his currency reserves as euros pile up at the bank at a record pace.
“The SNB has the same problem as lots of wealth managers,” said Ursina Kubli, an economist at Bank Sarasin in Zurich. “Safe assets have become very expensive. So for the time being, they prefer cash over investing.”
With Europe’s debt crisis hurting returns on the least risky bonds, the Swiss National Bank is keeping reserves in cash after its policy to cap the franc swelled currency holdings by 50 percent in the four months through June to a record 365 billion francs ($380 billion). Money held at central banks, the International Monetary Fund and the Bank for International Settlements accounted for 72 percent of the gain.
The SNB has been piling up euro holdings to defend the franc ceiling of 1.20 versus the single currency introduced in September 2011. While the central bank previously mainly invested foreign currencies in government bonds of AAA-rated nations, the surge in cash reserves suggests policy makers are finding it more difficult to find the right investments.

2012-08-29

The Cause of Europe's Economics Woes? Austerity or the Inept Central Planners?

I am really getting sick of hearing from both the left and ring wing politicians, from the governments and from the central bankers that austerity is the cause of the trouble in their respective countries — or anywhere else. For example the NYT keeps on publishing silly news reports written by inept journalists who keep on parroting inept central planners (governments and central bankers) and describing austerity as the cause of all the troubles in Europe.

In reality, there has been NO AUSTERITY at all, except in Greece and Ireland. So please French, Italian, Spanish and other EU countrymen, please, stop the lies. See for yourselves the charts below (source: Wikipedia).

As you can see, debt to GDP ratio for all the countries but Germany have been soaring in 2009 and 2010 — and notice that these year were labeled as growth years!

And the financing needs of almost all economies (except Ireland and the UK have been rising, including for 2012 — ignore the over optimistic forecasts for 2013...)

In what kind of austerity government spending increases? dramatically?

Moreover, austerity is the cure, and spending and debt are the poison. Unfortunately, your beloved Central Planners will simply keep on telling the opposite to the Lemmings and Parrots, who will keep on repeating and will follow them over the cliff.

2012-06-14

Bloomberg News Sues the ECB As ECB Tells Court Releasing Greek Swap Files Would Inflame Markets

I think this one is so obvious that I won't put any more comment than cheer Bloomberg for suing all these corrupt entities and try to spread the truth.
(Bloomberg)  June 14, 2012 — The European Central Bank said it can’t release files showing how Greece may have used derivatives to hide its borrowings because disclosure could still inflame the crisis threatening the future of the single currency.
Bloomberg News is suing the ECB to provide the documents under European Union freedom-of-information rules. The papers may help show the role EU authorities played in allowing Greece to mask its deficit for almost a decade before the nation’s troubled finances necessitated a 240 billion-euro ($301 billion) bailout and the biggest debt restructuring in history.
Disclosing the files when Bloomberg News first sought them in 2010 would have “fueled negative perceptions about Greece’s ability to honor its debt,” ECB lawyer Marta Lopez Torres said at a hearing of the European Union’s General Court in Luxembourg today. “It’s the same now with Spain” which “isn’t able to borrow money,” she said. “Markets are reacting in very volatile ways. It’s affecting the euro economy.”
[...] “Markets will perform better when they have transparency,” Timothy Pitt-Payne, lawyer for Bloomberg News, told the court. “The question is who knew what; and when did they know it?” 
Bloomberg’s lawsuit, filed in December 2010, requested access to two internal papers drafted for the central bank’s six-member Executive Board. They show how Greece used swaps to hide its borrowings, according to a March 3, 2010, note attached to the papers and obtained by Bloomberg News. 
The first document is entitled “The impact on government deficit and debt from off-market swaps: the Greek case.” The second reviews Titlos Plc, a securitization that allowed National Bank of Greece SA, the country’s biggest lender, to exchange swaps on Greek government debt for funding from the ECB, the Executive Board said in the cover note.
These documents “played a role” in shaping policy and “highlighted there were issues” when the ECB undertook a review of its eligibility criteria for collateral in its funding operations, the ECB lawyer told the court.
[...] “The public has a right to know how EU authorities may have allowed Greece to hide its deficit, which helped trigger Europe’s sovereign debt crisis,” said Matthew Winkler, editor- in-chief of Bloomberg News. “Greater transparency results in more accountability, and we seek this information to understand how this debt debacle unfolded in an effort to avoid repeating it.” 
The Greek government didn’t originally disclose the swaps, designed to help it comply with the deficit and debt rules it agreed to meet when it joined the euro in 2001. The swaps allowed the country to increase borrowings by 5.3 billion euros, Eurostat, the EU’s statistics agency, said in November 2010.
In April 2009 -- seven months before the Greek crisis erupted -- ECB officials spotted “a swap operation in unusual terms,” according to the March 2010 document. [...]

2012-06-11

Summary Of the Bailout of Spanish Banks Creditors So Far — Massive Downside Risk Ahead

If the bailout and the lies of the political class came as a surprise to you, please read my two previous posts published back in May.
Noteworthy news items:
My commentary

Spain is pretending that the loan is not a bailout, and not a rescue (who do they think they are fooling?). Moreover, it comes with supposedly no economic or fiscal conditions (that remains to be proven, since it seems like the Nordic countries want collateral, among other things). Finally, the bailout comes with more favorable terms than market terms, BUT there's a big BUT: the bonds are not only public debt, but apparently, they will be senior to the sovereign debt of Spain, meaning that the sovereign holders all of the sudden appear as secondary lenders, and far less secured than they were. This will put a massive pressure on the sovereign debt of Spain and by itself should be considered a credit event for CDS holders (to be confirmed). This should also trigger big credit downgrades of the sovereign bonds. I'm very curious to find out what will happen to the Spanish yields at market open. They should rise dramatically. 

Finally, if you think that this will stop the contagion think again: not only will this reopen the cases of  already bailed-out countries as they will undoubtedly seek to obtain the same terms as Spain, but it will further weaken the ability of the Eurozone countries to borrow as their debt levels rise to lend to the other insolvent ones, and also as those borrowing will see the new bonds to be senior to the sovereign bonds, making the risk of lending and hence the yields go higher.




Related quotes

Spain Seeks EU’s Fourth Bailout With $125 Billion Request
(Bloomberg) May 11, 2012 — Finland will demand collateral for its share of emergency loans to shore up the Spanish banking system should the money come from the euro-region’s temporary bailout fund, Finance Minister Jutta Urpilainen said. 
“It remains undecided whether the bailout will be granted via the temporary facility, in which case Finland will require collateral,” Urpilainen told reporters in Kokkola, Finland, yesterday. The other alternative is to grant the loan through the European Stability Mechanism, the “permanent crisis mechanism, which will provide better security for taxpayers” and won’t result in demands for extra guarantees, Urpilainen said. 
Bailout Key highlights:
  • GUINDOS SAYS SPAIN WILL SEEK EUROPEAN BAILOUT FOR ITS BANKS
  • GUINDOS SAYS CONSULTANTS' REPORTS TO BE PUBLISHED IN JUNE
  • GUINDOS SAYS FROB WILL RECEIVE THE FUNDS     
On the conditionality:
  • DE GUINDOS SAYS AID CARRIES NO MACRO-ECONOMIC, FISCAL CONDITION
  • GUINDOS SAYS BANKS GETTING AID WILL FACE CONDITIONS
  • IMF ONLY HAS ADVISORY, SUPPORT ROLE FOR SPAIN, DE GUINDOS SAYS
And the important stuff:
  • GUINDOS SAYS THIS IS NOT A `RESCUE'  
  • AID IS A LOAN IN VERY FAVORABLE TERMS, DE GUINDOS SAYS
  • GUINDOS SAYS TERMS MORE FAVORABLE THAN MARKET RATES    
And the most important stuff:
  • GUINDOS SAYS FROB'S DEBT COUNTS AS PUBLIC DEBT 
Eurogroup statement on Spain
The Eurogroup supports the efforts of the Spanish authorities to resolutely address the restructuring of its financial sector and it welcomes their intention to seek financial assistance from euro area Member States to this effect. 
The Eurogroup has been informed that the Spanish authorities will present a formal request shortly and is willing to respond favourably to such a request. 
The financial assistance would be provided by the EFSF/ESM for recapitalisation of financial institutions. The loan will be scaled to provide an effective backstop covering for all possible capital requirements estimated by the diagnostic exercise which the Spanish authorities have commissioned to the external evaluators and the international auditors. The loan amount must cover estimated capital requirements with an additional safety margin, estimated as summing up to EUR 100 billion in total. 
Following the formal request, an assessment should be provided by the Commission, in liaison with the ECB, EBA and the IMF, as well as a proposal for the necessary policy conditionality for the financial sector that shall accompany the assistance. 
The Eurogroup considers that the Fund for Orderly Bank Restructuring (F.R.O.B.), acting as agent of the Spanish government, could receive the funds and channel them to the financial institutions concerned. The  Spanish government will retain the full responsibility of the financial assistance and will sign the MoU
The Eurogroup notes that Spain has already implemented significant fiscal and labour market reforms and measures to strengthen the capital base of the Spanish banks. The restructuring plans in line with EU state-aid rules and horizontal structural reforms of the domestic financial sector. 
We invite the IMF to support the implementation and monitoring of the financial assistance with regular reporting.
Finland Wants Collateral for Spanish Bank Aid From EFSF
(Bloomberg) May 11, 2012 — Spain became the fourth euro member to seek a bailout since the start of the region’s debt crisis more than two years ago with a request for as much as 100 billion euros ($125 billion) in loans to rescue its banking system.
[...] 
Economy Minister Luis De Guindos announced the aid request yesterday after a three-hour conference call with his European counterparts. He said the terms of the rescue loans are “very favorable” compared with market rates.

The funds will be channeled through Spain’s FROB bank rescue fund, and will add to Spain’s debt [...] 
The European aid for Spain’s banking industry will carry an interest rate of about 3 percent, El Pais reported today, citing people familiar with Spain’s negotiations with its European partners whom the newspaper didn’t identify by name.[...] 
The bailout adds to the 386 billion euros ($480 billion) in pledges to Greece, Ireland and Portugal that European governments and the International Monetary Fund have made since 2010.
So we're now at about 486 billions euros into the ditch, and that's only the beginning for Spain.
[...] The Spanish government’s credibility was jolted by the funding hole reported last month by Bankia Group, the third- biggest Spanish lender. The bank’s new managers went beyond the government’s provisioning rules and asked for a 19 billion-euro bailout. De Guindos had said two weeks earlier that 15 billion euros would be enough to meet the requirements of the second of two banking decrees he has drafted this year. 
“The Spanish problem was entirely avoidable,” said Thomas Mayer, an economic adviser to Deutsche Bank AG in Frankfurt. “When Bankia got into trouble and they had to inject another 19 billion, the market thought, well, they don’t know what they are doing.”

[...] Finland will also demand collateral for their share of the loans if the funds come from the temporary European Financial Stability Facility, Finance Minister Jutta Urpilainen told reporters yesterday. Ministers haven’t decided whether that fund or its permanent successor, the European Stability Mechanism, will be used, Urpilainen and de Guindos said. Should the ESM provide the funds, the loans would be senior to outstanding government debt, giving Spain’s EU lenders protection at the expense of bondholders. 
Market reaction is unlikely to be favorable given that the bailout places even more strain on Spain’s creditworthiness, sets a precedent that the euro zone’s other bailed-out countries, in particular Ireland, are likely to object to, and risks putting pressure on Italy,” Nicholas Spiro, managing director at Spiro Sovereign Strategy, said in a note.
The highlighted sentences are of critical importance: basically, it will put a massive pressure on the sovereign debt of Spain. I'm very curious to find out what will happen to the Spanish yields at market open. They should rise dramatically. What kind of "bailout" would that be?
Rajoy, who said as recently as May 28 there would be no bailout for the nation’s lenders [...]
Well, Rajoy is a big fat liar as are ALL POLITICIANS. Is that news?

Ireland wants rescue deal negotiated to match Spain's
AFP - Ireland wants to renegotiate its rescue plan to benefit from the same treatment as Spain, which looks set to win a bailout for its banks without any broader economic reforms in return, European sources said on Saturday.
"Ireland raised two issues: one is the need to ensure parity of the deal with Spain retroactively on its bailout from EFSF," one European government source told AFP, referring to the temporary rescue fund, the European Financial Stability Facility.
Another European government source confirmed the information.

2012-05-14

More Denial and Madness from Spain: Santander CEO Derides Surge in Spain Defaults and Spain Rules Out Bailout as De Guindos Says Banks Funded

This is a follow up to the post I wrote just a couple of days. Just listen to the completely unbelievable statements made from the CEO of Santander, one of the biggest banks in the world, which also happen to be a Spanish and most likely highly distressed one. He also makes the statement that "this place is different", one of the most dangerous sentences of the investment world:
April 27 (Bloomberg) — JPMorgan Chase & Co., the world’s largest bond underwriter, predicts that Spanish mortgage arrears will surge as unemployment rises. That’s also the view from the international debt market, which has driven up yields on Spain’s bonds in a bet the country will have to bail out banks. 
In Spain, Banco Santander SA Chief Executive Officer Alfredo Saenz said yesterday that’s nonsense. “Mortgages get paid in good times and in bad,” he said in a news conference at the bank’s headquarters outside Madrid. “Anyone raising this problem as one of the issues for the Spanish financial system is saying something stupid.”
[...] 
“There does seem to be a strange contrast between the high level of unemployment and the surprisingly low level of delinquencies on mortgages,” said Georg Grodzki, who helps oversee $515 billion as head of credit research at Legal & General Plc in London. “This raises the issue of whether loans have been amended to make them look current when in fact they are distressed.” 
The more than 600 billion euros ($792 billion) of outstanding home loans on the books of lenders may be the “next elephant” for Spain as unemployment spurs defaults, JPMorgan analysts including Roberto Henriques and Gareth Davies wrote in a report published April 26. Spain’s jobless rate rose to 24.4 percent in the first quarter, the highest level in 18 years, from 22.9 percent in the previous three months, the National Statistics Institute said today.
[...] 
Saenz said Spanish culture is part of the reason why default rates remain low.
[...]
“It’s a sociological thing and that’s how it is,” said Saenz.
Santander had 59.4 billion euros of loans made to Spanish households to buy homes at the end of 2011 out of a total loan book in Spain of about 200 billion euros. The default ratio was 2.6 percent in March, down from 2.7 percent at the end of 2011, the bank said. 
The data is good so let’s not start debating the quality of the information,” said Saenz. “Mortgage arrears are not a problem and are not going to be a problem.

Santander isn’t the only Spanish bank defending its mortgage loan quality.
People “tend to look at the negative side, the unemployed that we have here,” said Manuel Gonzalez Cid, chief financial officer of Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria SA, Spain’s second- biggest lender, in an April 25 webcast for analysts. “But we don’t look at all the people who are working, who are paying their mortgages and paying their loans in a very normal fashion.” 
Of BBVA’s 79 billion euros of residential mortgage loans in Spain, 2.37 billion euros, or 3 percent, were impaired at the end of 2011, according to the bank’s annual report.
[...] Based on Irish default levels, a similar trend in Spain would lead to losses of 59 billion euros for the banks there, according to the JPMorgan analysts. 
The picture is clouded by the increasing willingness of banks to change the terms of loans to help customers keep up loan payments. Bankia SA, Spain’s third-biggest bank, said April 24 that it’s making 110 changes to loan terms a day and that mortgages made up 45 percent of the 7,300 term adjustments it carried out in the first quarter. 
Mortgages for individuals in all markets, including the U.S. and the U.K., normally are very resilient and resistant when the situation changes,” said Saenz. “That’s because mortgages get paid.” 
Has Saenz been living in a cave for the past 5 years?

And also: Spain Rules Out Bailout as De Guindos Says Banks Funded
April 27 (Bloomberg) -- Spanish Economy Minister Luis de Guindos ruled out seeking a bailout hours before Standard & Poor’s cut the country’s credit rating to three levels above junk and a report showed unemployment jumped close to a record. 
“Nobody has asked Spain, either officially or unofficially” to turn to Europe’s bailout mechanisms, he said in an interview in Madrid late yesterday. “We don’t need it.”

2012-05-11

Greek Man Set Himself on Fire As Bank Refuses To Renogociate His Overdue Loan

It really hurts me every time I read or hear that the greeks are fighting against the lifeline the EU is giving them, or even when I hear that the Germans should bail out the Greeks.

To put things straight again: Greek banks and their European lenders have been bailed out, but not the citizens.

This gutting picture (courtesy of Reuters) illustrates why the Greek people should revolt, and take their corrupt politicians down, leave the European Fascist Union, and default the public and private debt. OK the picture is not from today, it dates back in September 2011. But hopefully, you get the point.

A man sets himself on fire outside a bank branch in Thessaloniki in northern Greece September 16, 2011.  The 55-year old man had entered the bank and asked for a renegotiation of his overdue loan payments on his home and business, according to police, which he could not pay, but was refused by the bank.


2012-03-28

Japan Update: Tokyo Soil Would Be Qualified as “Radioactive Waste” In the US — Fukushima Reactor with Fatally High Radiation Levels, Hardly Any Water To Cool It

For those who are still in denial, put your reality lenses on: Fukushima is the biggest man-made disaster in history, and it is still impossible to assess its impact, although my opinion is that it will take decades, if not more, for us to fully grasp it.

I have friends in Japan who are in denial, and friends who have been relocated by the European/American employers, and who are still in denial. One of them is actually back to Tokyo for two weeks for holidays and laughs at me every time I tell him about the situation in Japan.

Tokyo is a city that I love — and also many parts of Japan, which I have travelled extensively.

I have crossed Japan from both business and leisure trips since the disaster at Fukushima.

All these make me very sad, but more than sadness, it's infuriating (though 100% expected) that the governments will do everything in their power to hide the truth. We just have to count only on our own judgement and on the Internet to keep the truth available.

From the Washington Post (via AP):
TOKYO — One of Japan’s crippled nuclear reactors still has fatally high radiation levels and hardly any water to cool it, according to an internal examination Tuesday that renews doubts about the plant’s stability. 
A tool equipped with a tiny video camera, a thermometer, a dosimeter and a water gauge was used to assess damage inside the No. 2 reactor’s containment chamber for the second time since the tsunami swept into the Fukushima Dai-ichi plant a year ago. The probe done in January failed to find the water surface and provided only images showing steam, unidentified parts and rusty metal surfaces scarred by exposure to radiation, heat and humidity. 
The data collected from the probes showed the damage from the disaster was so severe, the plant operator will have to develop special equipment and technology to tolerate the harsh environment and decommission the plant, a process expected to last decades
Tuesday’s examination with an industrial endoscope detected radiation levels up to 10 times the fatal dose inside the chamber. Plant officials previously said more than half of melted fuel has breached the core and dropped to the floor of the primary containment vessel, some of it splashing against the wall or the floor. 
Particles from melted fuel have probably sent radiation levels up to dangerously high 70 sieverts per hour inside the container, said Junichi Matsumoto, spokesman for Tokyo Electric Power Co. 
Note: 7-8 sieverts are considered fatal doses. Few instruments are capable of measuring more than 10 sieverts.

From Wikipedia:
Maximum acceptable dose for the public from any man made facility: 0.001 Sv/year
Criterion for relocation after Chernobyl disaster: 0.35 Sv/lifetime

“It’s extremely high,” he said, adding that an endoscope would last only 14 hours in that condition. “We have to develop equipment that can tolerate high radiation” when locating and removing melted fuel during the decommissioning. 
The probe also found the containment vessel — a beaker-shaped container enclosing the core — had cooling water up to only 60 centimeters (2 feet) from the bottom, far below the 10 meters (yards) estimated when the government declared the plant stable in December. 
[...] 
Three Dai-ichi reactors had meltdowns, but the No. 2 reactor is the only one that has been examined because radiation levels inside the reactor building are relatively low and its container is designed with a convenient slot to send in the endoscope. 
The exact conditions of the other two reactors, where hydrogen explosions damaged their buildings, are still unknown. Simulations have indicated that more fuel inside No. 1 has breached the core than the other two, but radiation at No. 3 remains the highest. 
The high radiation levels inside the No. 2 reactor’s chamber mean it’s inaccessible to the workers, but parts of the reactor building are accessible for a few minutes at a time — with the workers wearing full protection. 
[...] During a recent visit by a group of journalists including The Associated Press, the head of the plant said it remains vulnerable to strong aftershocks and tsunami and containing contaminated water and radiation is a challenge. Radioactive water had leaked into the ocean several times already. 
Workers found the fresh leak of 120 tons from a water treatment unit this week from one of its hoses, with estimated 80 liters (20 gallons) escaping into the ocean, Matsumoto said. Officials are still investigating its impact. [...]
Via WashingtonsBlog (via ZeroHedge):
Nuclear engineer Arnie Gundersen took 5 random soil samples in Tokyo recently, and found that all 5 were so radioactive that they would be considered radioactive waste in the United States, which would have to be specially disposed of at a facility in Texas:
Tokyo Soil Samples Would Be Considered Nuclear Waste In The US from Fairewinds Energy Education.
On YouTube (please click on CC to get the English subtitles). This report is one of the most troubling and scary ones, exposing the levels of radiations, the actions of Tepco and the J-Gov to hide the truth and prevent people from talking to the press. There's even a high-respected Japanese doctor, saying on behalf of the government, that if you keep smiling, you won't be hit by radiation.


Another similar report, on France24 in English this time: 

2012-03-03

Australia's Treasurer Starts Class Warfare and Promotes Socialist Lies and Finger Pointing


Amazing story, and amazingly stupid behaviour by the politicians in Australia, biting the hand that feeds the whole bubble economy and starting a social warfare on the people and companies who basically run the country which would be wasteland without mining and agricultural companies.
March 2 (Bloomberg) -- Australian Treasurer Wayne Swan said resource tycoons including Gina Rinehart, Clive Palmer and Andrew Forrest are threatening the nation’s democratic process by using their wealth to shape policy to their interests.
They wouldn't be able to shape anything if:
  1.  Politicians and the state didn't have so much power to being with, as libertarians have been promoting for hundreds of years
  2. Politicians were not so corrupt, and wouldn't accept money, legally or under the table, to change their mind on any topic.
In an article in The Monthly magazine, Swan said the billionaires are undermining the Australian notion of a “fair go” -- where everyone has an opportunity to prosper. He cited a mining companies’ campaign against the resource profit tax in 2010 that contributed to the ouster of former Prime Minister Kevin Rudd.
Oh, now I see it. He wanted to tax them, take by force their property and wealth, and they fought against it. Should they just let the robbers create a low to legally expropriate them?
“The infamous billionaires’ protest against the mining tax would have been laughed out of town in the Australia I grew up in, and yet it received a wide and favorable reception two years ago,” Swan said. “A handful of vested interests that have pocketed a disproportionate share of the nation’s economic success now feel they have a right to shape Australia’s future to satisfy their own self-interest.”
When you fail on the ideological debate, make it personal against the people, and attack them on other grounds. Well done Swan.
The article is a signal of stepped up efforts by Prime Minister Julia Gillard’s administration to build public support for taxes on mining profits and carbon emissions due to take effect on July 1. Her government trails the opposition Liberal- National coalition by 10 percentage points, a margin that if replicated at the election due in the second half of next year would represent a landslide defeat.
 I can only hope that they will fail, and that voters will through these liars and corrupt politicians out. If they don't, well, the future of Australia — already extremely bleak — will be at stake.
“This government, if anything, has been too circumspect in criticizing vested interests,” said Paul Strangio, a senior lecturer on Australian politics at Melbourne’s Monash University, who primarily researches the Labor party. 
“These very wealthy people -- some have described them as oligarchs -- are throwing their weight around in public policy and if they do enter the public arena, and try to impose their influence over public policy, it’s within the government’s ambit to answer that,” Strangio said.
Of course, university professors, socialists and pro-government by definition, always will support attacks against the rich.
BHP Billiton Ltd., Rio Tinto Group and Forrest’s Fortescue Metals Group Ltd. campaigned against the government’s proposed 40 percent tax that helped turn public opinion against Rudd. The former prime minister’s weakening poll ratings were among reasons Labor lawmakers cited for his ousting in a late-night coup in June 2010. Gillard negotiated a lower tax rate to assuage the resource industry.
Seems like politicians will, once they have lost by the rules, try to hit under the belt.
Fortescue said in a statement that its board met earlier today to discuss the “unfounded attacks” by Swan on Forrest. 
The company said it will pay more than A$1 billion in taxes, royalties and other government assessments this year and is projected to pay more than A$2 billion next year. Fortescue described Swan’s comments on its taxes as an “irrational outburst.” 
Forrest “started with nothing and repeatedly put everything he had earned at risk in building one of the most important mining operations in the world,” the company said in response to the treasurer’s comments. “Andrew epitomizes the spirit of what an Australian can do if given a ‘fair go’.”
Who has built something valuable and useful? The "Mining Oligarch"? or the Politician? Who is creating thousands of jobs?
[...]“To be blunt, the rising power of vested interests is undermining our equality and threatening our democracy,” Swan said. “We see this most obviously in the ferocious and highly misleading campaigns waged in recent years against resource taxation reforms and the pricing of carbon pollution.”
How irritating is Swan...
[...] Swan criticized the nation’s four biggest banks last month after Australia & New Zealand Banking Group Ltd. boosted interest rates independent of central bank policy. The Reserve Bank of Australia kept its benchmark unchanged at 4.25 percent at its Feb. 7 policy meeting.
“For reasons that they can explain themselves, from time to time they decide that they want to give priority to their shareholders over their customers,” Swan told reporters Feb. 10. “The fact is that the major banks in this country are very profitable and their interest margins are back to where they were prior to the global financial crisis.”
The fact is that it's none of your business, Swan. Corporations belong to shareholders and ALWAYS give priority to them over their customers. Customers have the right to either go to competition, or decide to pay more.
[...] Rinehart, whose $18 billion fortune tops Forbes Asia’s rich list for women, is set to become the world’s wealthiest woman this year, surpassing Wal-Mart Stores Inc.’s Christy Walton. Forrest has a net worth of $5.3 billion, making him the third- richest Australian, Forbes said. Australia’s BRW magazine estimates Palmer’s wealth at A$5.05 billion ($5.5 billion). 
Australia’s economy is propelled by a mining boom predicted to last decades as the urbanization of hundreds of millions of people in China and India drives demand for iron ore, liquefied natural gas and coal. [...]
I'll cut short here.  Seems like politicians in Australia are as bad as those in France and Greece. God — or, more realistically, Voters — protects and saves the Australians from their destructive and dangerous ideas.

2012-02-26

Japan Update: GDP Sinks, Record Trade Deficit, Fukushima Temperature Surpasses 752 Degrees, Pension Funds Nightmare Scenario

23 years into the depression following the Government and Central Bank sponsored the real estate and credit bubble in Japan, and with trillions of dollars wasted on Keynesian stimulus, there's still no end in sight, and things are actually getting worse and worse — depending on what the government will do, the end game is either going to be: massive multi-trillion default on the JGBs or hyper-inflation. Nice huh?

Here are main items from the past week or two:
Feb. 13 (Bloomberg) -- Japan’s economy shrank an annualized 2.3 percent in the fourth quarter, more than economists estimated, as slumping exports undermine a recovery from last year’s record earthquake. 
The contraction compared with the median forecast for a 1.3 percent decline in a Bloomberg News survey of 26 economists. Growth was a revised 7 percent in the previous quarter, the Cabinet Office said today in Tokyo.
Another report, another opportunity for the economists — usually referred to as "the useless bunch of highly overpaid ignorants" — to prove how useless they are and how little they understand about the economy.
Japan posted a record trade deficit in January as the yen’s strength and weaker global demand eroded manufacturers’ profits and slowed the nation’s recovery from last year’s earthquake and tsunami. 
The gap widened to 1.48 trillion yen ($19 billion) and shipments dropped 9.3 percent from a year earlier as energy imports surged, a Ministry of Finance reported in Tokyo today.
[...] In Japan, the country’s trade deficit of 2.49 trillion yen in 2011 was the second largest since World War II. That also contributed to the nation’s current-account surplus sliding to a 15-year low in 2011.
[...]
“Clearly Japanese manufacturers are struggling,” Hiroshi Shiraishi, an economist at BNP Paribas SA in Tokyo, said before the report. “We aren’t really expecting a major pick-up in external demand because the U.S. and Europe are undergoing balance sheet adjustments.”
[...]
Japan’s exports to the EU, its third-largest export region, fell 39 percent from 2007 to last year, according to Ministry of Finance figures.
[...] 
With global demand for imports out of Japan dropping, and energy imports into Japan surging, I guess that the BoJ must be very clever to try to weaken the Yen, right?

 And in addition to the economic depression, the natural and human catastrophes are pilling in. Here's an update on Fukushima — an made in Japan, man made global disaster:
Feb. 13 (Bloomberg) -- Tokyo Electric Power Co. said the temperature in one of the damaged reactors at its Fukushima nuclear station rose to levels above safety limits even as it injected increased amounts of cooling water. 
One of three thermometers indicated the temperature at the bottom of the No. 2 reactor pressure vessel rose to 93.7 degrees Celsius (200.7 Fahrenheit) today, higher than the 80 degrees limit, Ai Tanaka, a spokeswoman for the utility known as Tepco, said by phone today. 
 But Zero Hedge claims:
But major Japanese news sources Yomiuri and Jiji note that the thermometer in reactor 2 has since climbed to 272.8 degrees Celsius, and then hit the upper limit of the thermometer at 400 degrees Celsius (752 degrees Fahrenheit).
Finally, pension funds are struggling in Japan with rates at record 0.5% for the past 2 decades or so, and equities not performing globally. Fraud and lies will not help solve the issues.
Feb. 23 (Bloomberg) -- Japan’s financial regulator ordered AIJ Investment Advisors Co. to halt its business after finding the asset manager’s clients funds of about 183.2 billion yen ($2.3 billion) may be “adversely affected” and started a probe into the 263 asset managers operating in the nation. 
“We’ve ordered AIJ to halt business for a month in order to safeguard investors, as it appears client assets have been adversely affected,” Financial Services Minister Shozaburo Jimi told reporters at a briefing in Tokyo. The regulator is still investigating the firm and can’t comment on losses. The suspension lasts from today until March 23, the regulator said. 
AIJ, a Tokyo-based asset-management firm, may have lost most of the 200 billion yen ($2.5 billion) it manages for companies’ pension plans, the Nikkei newspaper said today, citing unidentified securities investigators. Regulators have been investigating AIJ since the end of January and are unable to explain where some money went, the Nikkei reported. 
Japanese pension plans have been suffering from two decades of slumping markets and an aging population. Alternative investments were becoming one of the options for the retirement funds, which have traditionally invested mainly in bonds, as ways to maintain steady returns and fund retiree benefits in a country where more than one in five people are over 65. 
AIJ, led by Kazuhiko Asakawa, was established in April 1989, and had 120 clients including pension plans with 183.2 billion yen in assets as of the end of 2010, according to a statement from the Financial Services Agency, adding it has 12 employees
Only 12 employees?? Wow, you might start from here. How can a firm with 12 employees manage 120 clients and manage many billions of asset?

2012-02-19

UK Retail Sales Unexpectedly Jump in January — Looking Beyond the Headline Number to Debunk it and Uncover Flawed Methodology Used by the ONS

Optimism reached a new high in the UK on Friday and the UK equity market and the GBP jumped, when the Office of National Statistics published an unexpected jump in the retail sales index:
(The Telegraph) — Official retail sales data for January rose 0.9pc month-on-month, well above gloomy forecasts of a 0.4pc decline, as falling inflation and post-Christmas discounting lured consumers back to the shops. 
Economists said the performance was surprisingly strong because it came on the back of a 0.6pc rise in December, which was itself better than had been expected. 
"It suggests at the very least that we will be growing by 0.5pc in the first quarter and probably faster than that," said Scotia Capital economist Alan Clarke, who was one of the first to warn of a contraction before the 0.2pc decline in the final three months of last year. "This is the third strong indication that the UK economy has turned the corner."
As per usual, economists — this highly (over)paid yet ignorant and incompetent bunch — completely missed their forecast, and then tried to explain a posteriori the reason why sales jumped in January, yet again completely missing the point.

First, here are a couple of other pieces of news that were not making headlines — obviously so because market participants are in über-bullish mode and are only look at the bright side of the news:
(The Daily Mail) — Around 14 shops are shutting every day on the High Street, alarming figures show. 
Last year 5,268 shops were closed by major retailers and only 5,094 opened, according to a study by accountants PricewaterhouseCoopers and the Local Data Company. 
It was the first time since the height of the recession in 2009 that more shops were shut than opened.
[...]
The real number of closures could well be higher as the research only focused on chain stores in the 500 biggest town centres.
[...]
London fared worst in 2011, with 1,084 shops shutting and just 983 opening, according to the study.
[...]
Beyond showing the incompetence of Mervyn King, the following report confirms that debt deflation has started in the UK:
(The Daily Mail) — Bank of England Governor Sir Mervyn King yesterday spoke out against the ‘harsh treatment’ of small companies which are still ‘suffering’ at the hands of the banks.

He said ‘market failure’ meant firms are being starved of the funds they need to grow, create jobs and drive the economic recovery.

The startling statistics emerged in Bank of England figures showing that net lending fell by £10.7 billion in 2011 – in other words, the banks received £10.7billion more in loan repayments than they gave out in new loans. That took the total fall since the end of 2008 to £82.7 billion.
After all the manipulation and fiddling that the BoE is doing, the one thing that is currently working fine — small business not borrowing, and banks not lending to insolvent firms — is considered to be a "market failure". This is the favorite game of central planners and socialists: blame the market for their own failure, and make a bigger mess trying to fix it.

Summary:
  • Retail sales as reported by the ONS jumped in Jan
  • While business are closing at an alarming rate of 14 shops a day for the whole of 2011
  • And debt has been deflating for 3 years in a row, showing that business are not trying to borrow to expand (in obvious contradiction with what would happen if sales were rising).
So, where am I going will all this?

As with any thing reported by the government, one must look a bit further than the headline number — ironically, market participants whose very job is to do so won't do it — and try to find what is really going on.

Looking at the methodology used by the ONS to calculate their retail sales index gives us the answer:
Understanding the data

Quick Guide to the Retail Sales Index (116.9 Kb Pdf)

Interpreting the data
The Retail Sales Index (RSI) is derived from a monthly survey of 5,000 businesses in Great Britain. The sample represents the whole retail sector and includes all large retailers and a representative panel of smaller businesses. Collectively all of these businesses cover approximately 95 per cent of the retail sector in terms of turnover.
There, you have it: they survey 5,000 businesses, completely ignoring the fact that many businesses are closing on a daily basis. This creates a massive survivorship bias and leads to completely distorted numbers.  Could Wikipedia's quote fit more to the ONS flawed methodology?
Survivorship bias is the logical error of concentrating on the people or things that "survived" some process and inadvertently overlooking those that didn't because of their lack of visibility. This can lead to false conclusions in several different ways. 
The survivors may literally be people, as in a medical study, or could be companies or research subjects or applicants for a job, or anything that must make it past some selection process to be considered further. 
Survivorship bias can lead to overly optimistic beliefs because failures are ignored, such as when companies that no longer exist are excluded from analyses of financial performance.
Should someone send this link to the incompetent people at the ONS so that they can fix their methodology?

Finally, not only the survivorship bias make you miss direct losses due to businesses closing, but these failures make the surviving businesses more prosperous, artificially making the retails sales numbers bigger.

Let me give an example to illustrate this last point: imagine your local baker closes down because it wasn't a viable business. Yet, some part of their customers will still want to buy bread and would divert their shopping to another other local baker. The local baker might see it sales raise by say 20%, yet that original baker lost 100% of its sales. So the surveyed shop would report a jump in sale of 20%, but the loss of that 100% from the closed-down baker will not be accounted for in the retail sales number.

2012-01-24

Fukushima Tragedy: Regulators Allow Radioactive Waste Dumping in Tokyo Bay

This is a must-see presentation summing up the radio-active hazards that the Japanese are facing, and also people all over the world.

In addition to that, it seems like the Japanese government has decided to simply dump all the radioactive waste into the wild, which will contaminate sooner or later the whole planet for thousands if not millions of years.

When I think that my friends believe I've lost it simply because I won't drink my favorite beer (Kirin) or any other Japanese beer, I guess we now know that I was right not trusting the Japanese government to keep us safe...


Is the Japanese government and the IAEA protecting the nuclear industry and not the people of Japan by claiming that Fukushima is stable when it is not? Fairewinds’ chief engineer Arnie Gundersen outlines major inconsistencies and double-speak by the IAEA, Japanese Government, and TEPCO claiming that the Fukushima accident is over. Dynamic versus static equilibrium, escalated dose exposures to the Japanese children and nuclear workers, and the blending of radioactive materials with non-contaminated material and spreading this contaminated ash throughout Japan are only a small part of this ongoing nuclear tragedy.

2011-10-27

ISDA Says Greek 50% Writedown Not A Credit Event

ISDA says Greek 50% write down is not a credit event, and hence will not trigger CDS payments. The massive fraud perpetrated by the ISDA is simply unbelievable.

Needless to say, this is yet another massive transfer of wealth from people whose forecasts were right to those who are plain and simply losers.

What is going to be interesting is to find out whether there will be litigations around this decision, and even more importantly, whether the CDS market and instrument will survive in face of such a blatant fraud and theft.
Oct. 27 (Bloomberg) -- The European Union’s agreement with investors for a voluntary 50 percent writedown on their Greek bond holdings means $3.7 billion of debt-insurance contracts won’t be triggered, according to the International Swaps & Derivatives Association’s rules. 
ISDA will decide if the credit-default swaps should pay out depending on whether it judges losses to be voluntary or compulsory. European leaders said in today’s agreement they “invite Greece, private investors and all parties concerned to develop a voluntary bond exchange” into new debt. 
A last minute agreement was reached after banks, the biggest private holders of Greece’s government bonds, were threatened with a costly full default, according to Luxembourg Prime Minister Jean-Claude Juncker. The involvement of the Institute of International Finance, which represents lenders, also helped progress toward an accord that the EU could portray as non-mandatory.
As long as the agreement is voluntary, then CDS aren’t triggered,” said Cagdas Aksu, an analyst at Barclays Capital in London. “Provided it’s voluntary, CDS wouldn’t be triggered unless the Greeks missed a payment.” 
David Geen, ISDA’s general counsel in London, didn’t immediately respond to e-mailed questions.

2011-09-25

30 Year Old Boutique Hedge Fund Manager Makes Fortunes Uncovering US Listed Chinese Scams Companies

My friend Mr. H forwarded me a Washington Post report titled Gaining by betting against flimsy Chinese firms which is proving right my previous forecasts about the scams going on in China and how many of their exchange companies would go to zero.

I find this story fascinating because it shows just how a small amount of research and very clever tactics can bring down these scammers and make you rich in the process, while big Wall Street firms are completely unable to come up with any useful information, even after paying their analysts hundreds of thousands of dollars a year.

Did you know there is about $20 billion worth of small- to medium-size Chinese companies listed on U.S. exchanges ? That makes the potential losses for western investors quite high.

Here's the story, with my emphasis.
Sahm Adrangi works with six other people in a small room on Madison Avenue with a view of an adjacent brick building. 
He doesn’t speak Chinese. He’s never set foot in China. At 30, he claims no special insight into the sources or durability of the Chinese economic miracle. Yet he has managed to dig up enough information to wreck the fortunes of several Chinese companies — while building up his own. 
Two years ago, Adrangi, a 2003 Yale graduate, left an investment banking job and set up a small hedge fund, largely with money from himself and his parents, as well as a few other supporters. Since then, his red-hot fund has increased sixfold, partly a fortuitous accident of market timing but mostly a product of his ability to spot flimsy Chinese companies listed on U.S. markets — which he bets against by short-selling them. 
The firm is tiny by hedge fund standards, with $20 million under management. But Adrangi has promoted his bets through newsletters and online postings that savage U.S.-listed Chinese companies he views as “scams.” In doing so and doing well, he has grabbed the attention of eager U.S. investors and fearful Chinese executives — not to mention U.S. regulators who are trying to keep track of about $20 billion worth of small- to medium-size Chinese companies listed on U.S. exchanges. 
Here are a few samples of Adrangi’s scathing assessments: 
China Education Alliance “is mostly a hoax,” he wrote of a Chinese for-profit education firm, which then had a $150 million market value on the New York Stock Exchange and is now worth less than $25 million. 
The company’s Harbin “training center” — which CEA said had “17 modern classrooms” for 1,200 students — had no desks and was all but empty, Adrangi said. It boasted of online revenue, but its Web site didn’t work
China Biotics claimed to have more than 100 outlets for its nutritional supplements; Adrangi said he hired researchers who checked all the company’s business addresses and found only four outlets. Later, on June 22, the company’s auditors resigned, citing “irregularities” that might “constitute illegal acts” and for which the board had “not taken timely and appropriate remedial actions.” The company is contesting a shareholder suit in Washington that makes the same allegations. 
China Marine, a maker of snacks and an algae drink, reported revenue to China’s State Administration of Industry and Commerce that was 85 percent lower than what it reported in U.S. filings, Adrangi said. The company reaffirmed its U.S. reporting, but on Aug. 8 (considered an auspicious day in China), it announced just $1 million in quarterly profits, down 85 percent from a year earlier. 
Noting extremely high profit margins claimed by one of China’s battery manufacturers, Adrangi wrote that he believed the firm was “fabricating its SEC financial statements.” He added that the company’s battery plant “is either the world’s most spectacular battery manufacturing facility or the company’s financial statements are fiction. We believe it’s the latter.” The companies have disputed Adrangi’s assessments, insisting that they are not misleading U.S. investors or regulators. 
[...] All of their targets are drawn from the more than 300 Chinese companies that since 2004 have taken advantage of a technique known as the reverse merger. It is a sort of backdoor way into the prized U.S. capital markets. It works like this: A Chinese company seeking access to U.S. capital markets swaps its shares with the shares of a U.S.-listed company that has fallen on hard times and has been reduced to nothing more than a shell. Usually the U.S.-listed company takes on a new name, appoints new directors, reports glowing results from its new Chinese operations and raises millions of dollars by issuing stock and luring new investors. And it does this without having to go through the regulatory steps that would be required for a newly listed company, especially one based in China
[...] Adrangi has taken an accidental route to the China investment field. Born in Iran, his parents moved to California when he was 5 and then to Vancouver. His father, an engineer in Iran, bought a fencing company. Adrangi attended a prestigious boys’ school and then went to Yale. When he arrived, he was an activist.[...] But he wasn’t able to turn those internships into a full-time job. So he moved to New York and went to work for Deutsche Bank. He applied to law schools and deferred three of them. He never went. Instead, he moved to Long acre Management, selling distressed assets of bankrupt companies. Then he went out on his own. 
Initially the fund wasn’t focused on Chinese companies. Even today it has invested in about 100 non-Chinese companies, including wireless companies in Africa, a Costco-like retailer in central America and an Internet bank in the United States. But then Adrangi read about Bird and called him for advice. Bird told him that looking at the books of Chinese reverse merger firms was like listening to someone claim they drove 300 mph to arrive on time for dinner. “The sales were outstanding, but it didn’t make sense,” Adrangi said
Adrangi’s first forays into attack mode were anonymous because he feared retaliation or lawsuits. He created a Web site and posted brief items pointing to companies he believed to be hyped. The SEC forbids hedge funds from soliciting customers on the Web, so Adrangi made no mention of his firm, Kerrisdale Capital, or his fund. Then he read signed reports about Chinese reverse merger companies and he began to do the same. He took aim at China Education Alliance. The company went public in 2004 through a reverse merger. [...] The company said it distributed educational materials online, but Adrangi found through researchers that the Web sites didn’t work, payment mechanisms didn’t function [...] , he sent researchers to the company’s training center. They took photos and video of the virtually empty building, which he posted. CEA said it had more than $12 million of revenue from the center. Since Adrangi first posted his attack on CEA, the company’s stock has plunged from $4.50 a share on Nov. 26, 2010, to 76 cents on Aug. 22 — even though the CEA chairman has bought $1 million in shares to bolster the price, chief financial officer Rogers says. 
Adrangi also made money shorting China MediaExpress, a firm that operates television advertising on inter-city express buses. A darling of China investors, the company’s auditors resigned, the stock price collapsed and in time trading in the shares was halted. 
And Adrangi profited from the collapse of Rino, a Dalian-based maker of industrial pollution control equipment. The stock, which once traded as high as $35 a share, has since been taken off the exchange. 
[...] In 2010, its 81.5 percent return (before fees) crushed the Standard & Poor’s 500-stock index’s 15.1 percent gain. Aside from its bets on a few U.S.-listed Chinese companies, its portfolio “roughly tracked the market,” Adrangi said in a letter to investors, warning that “we do not have a magic formula” for “generating outsized returns.” Three months later, more Chinese reverse merger companies “imploded,” Adrangi told investors, and his firm Kerrisdale Capital rang up more big gains. Its top five investments were all shorts of U.S.-listed Chinese firms. The run continued in the second quarter, when the fund returned 54 percent (before fees) against 0.1 percent for the S&P 500. 
[...] Although Adrangi has skewered many Chinese companies listed in the United States, he has little sympathy for investors who lose money on them. “The responsibility belongs with investors who make these investments,” he said. “No one should be relying on the SEC or underwriters to protect them.” He said that if investors “end up holding the bag, that’s just the way capital markets work.” But he conceded it can be hard to see through the stories the companies spin. “Historically, stock scams are promoters promoting stories. The actual numbers will tell a more truthful story,” he said. “If it’s a mining company and there is nothing in ground . . . the numbers don’t lie. The people do. The trick here is that the numbers are made up.”