2008-08-31

More info about Central Banks intervention on the USD

Reuters is reporting:
NEW YORK, Aug 27 (Reuters) - The United States, Europe and Japan had planned to intervene and rescue a weak U.S. dollar in March, business newspaper Nikkei reported on Wednesday.
Officials from the U.S. Treasury Department, Japan's Finance Ministry, and the European Central Bank reportedly drew up a currency contingency plan to be undertaken over the March 15-16 weekend, Nikkei reported, citing sources familiar with the situation.
The monetary officials also agreed on a framework for coordinating dollar-buying intervention, the report said.
They conclude that the intervention did not happen.

However, Stefan Karlsson reports that central banks are purchasing dollars on this post.

It's still very blurry and impossible to conclude anything, and with the month of August ending and people getting back from holiday, things might get more normal. After that, next big mile stone will be the election in the US... It seems like Paulson and friends are trying to make everything they can the hand the collapse to the next president, even if it means adding a few trillion USD on the shoulders of the American Citizens.

2008-08-30

Independ movies to wake up America (and the rest of the world)?

Well, it's the week-end, so you need to relax, why not avoiding turning our brains off during the week-ends and go and watch these eye-opening movies? It looks like the perfect timing for a wake-up call in the US, with the elections etc. and independent movies are trying to do what the regular media is not doing.
  • I.O.U.S.A boldly examines the rapidly growing national debt and its consequences for the United States and its citizens. Burdened with an ever-expanding government and military, increased international competition, overextended entitlement programs, and debts to foreign countries that are becoming impossible to honor, America must mend its spendthrift ways or face an economic disaster of epic proportions.
  • Trouble The Water Winner of the Grand Jury Prize at the 2008 Sundance Film Festival, this astonishingly powerful documentary is at once horrifying and exhilarating. Directed and produced by Fahrenheit 9/11 and Bowling for Columbine producers Tia Lessin and Carl Deal, Trouble the Watertakes you inside Hurricane Katrina in a way never before seen on screen. The film opens the day before the storm makes landfall—just blocks away from the French Quarter but far from the New Orleans that most tourists knew. Kimberly Rivers Roberts, an aspiring rap artist, is turning her new video camera on herself and her 9th Ward neighbors trapped in the city. “It’s going to be a day to remember,” Kim declares.
  • Stealing America, vote by vote For more than thirty years, exit polls accurately predicted election results. Over the last ten years that reliability has disappeared. What’s going on? The last two presidential elections both came down to a relatively small number of votes, and in both elections the integrity of the voting process has been called into question. With the upcoming election looking to be similarly close, the time has come to ask the questions: What happened in 2000 and 2004? What, if anything, has changed since? And what can be done to ensure a fair and honest tabulation of votes in 2008?
  • Flow Irena Salina's award-winning documentary investigation into what experts label the most important political and environmental issue of the 21st Century - The World Water Crisis. Salina builds a case against the growing privatization of the world!s dwindling fresh water supply with an unflinching focus on politics, pollution, human rights, and the emergence of a domineering world water cartel.

2008-08-29

S&P 500 is rising quickly - things are getting worse...

While the Dow Jones and Russell 2000 still have a negative EPS and hence no PER, the PER of the S&P 500 rising quickly and reaching historical high levels if you exclude the Internet bubble. We all know how things end, when we reach these levels...


Click on the image for a bigger image.

GDP, Gold, Silver, Consiparicy Theories as per Mish.

Mish has posted as usual, interesting and insightful points of view in his blog.
All these articles are very interesting and insightful. Personally, I don't draw a straight conclusion about whether there is a conspiracy or not and I buy the physical and take delivery of it so that I cannot sell them on the short term and am planning on keeping them for next several decades. The lower the price of gold/silver/platinum/palladium/rhodium, the better the buying opportunity is for me.

I am also interested in opposing points of views and enjoy reading Mish.

BUT I find it a little confusing that he spends so much time debunking conspiracy theories, to then post an article saying the GDP figures cannot be trusted and that the US government is manipulating the data.

My opinion is:
  • Governments are manipulating (and have been for the past many years) the inflation figures by a huge extent (and hence manipulating GDP as well) and also employment figures. Of course, the most manipulated figures and lies come from the US government and the duo G. W. Bush/Hank Paulson
  • Corporations, specially financial companies, are manipulating their income and balance sheets
  • The Central Banks manipulating the rates and the value of the currency and hence stealing from the savers and destructing the currencies in order to save banks and a financial system that brought all these issues.
  • The BoE is printing like crazy as well, and in secrecy...
  • It is suspicious that Oil, Gold, Silver crash the very month when the Fed needs to see lower inflation in order to be able to lower rates...
Wait and See.

2008-08-26

CAC40 contains only 39 components

A little bit out topic for this blog, but it's a fun fact:
Since GDF and Suez, the composition of the CAC40 index hasn't changed, which results in the CAC containing only 39 components.

CFTC data suggests gold and silver market manipulation by banks

Rob Kirby published an article spotting a huge anomaly on the Gold and Silver positions held by the US banks. From July to August, short positions in Silver increased by 500%, rising from 6,200 to almost 34,000 contracts and Gold short positions increased about 1,100%, rising from about 7,800 to more than 86,000.

The notional for Gold contracts is 100 ounces while the notional for Silver contracts is 1000 ounces. So basically, these US banks are short about 34,000,000 ounces of silver and about 8,600,000 ounces of Gold.

Here are the relevant CFTC links: July, August

Same applies for non U.S. banks.

US Dollar rebound results from Chinese stealth intervention

The Telegraph runs the following article which states that the USD rebound is coming from Chinese intervention:

China has resorted to stealth intervention in the currency markets to amass US dollars, using indirect means to hold down the yuan and ease the pain for its struggling exporters as the global slowdown engulfs the economy.

A study by HSBC's currency team in Asia has concluded that China's central bank is in effect forcing commercial banks to build up large dollar reserves, using them as arms-length proxies in a renewed campaign of exchange rate intervention.

2008-08-24

China warns the US - 1st semi-official warning?

Aug. 22 (Bloomberg) -- A failure of U.S. mortgage finance companies Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac could be a catastrophe for the global financial system, said Yu Yongding, a former adviser to China's central bank.

``If the U.S. government allows Fannie and Freddie to fail and international investors are not compensated adequately, the consequences will be catastrophic,'' Yu said in e-mailed answers to questions yesterday. ``If it is not the end of the world, it is the end of the current international financial system.''

Freddie and Fannie shares touched 20-year lows yesterday on speculation that a government bailout will leave the stocks worthless. Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson won approval from the U.S. Congress last month to pump unlimited amounts of capital into the companies in an emergency.

China's $376 billion of long-term U.S. agency debt is mostly in Fannie and Freddie assets, according to James McCormack, head of Asian sovereign ratings at Fitch Ratings Ltd. in Hong Kong. The Chinese government probably holds the bulk of that amount, according to McCormack.

Industrial & Commercial Bank of China yesterday reported a $2.7 billion holding. Bank of China Ltd. may have $20 billion, according to CLSA Ltd., the Hong Kong-based investment banking arm of France's Credit Agricole SA. CLSA puts the exposure of the six biggest Chinese banks at $30 billion.

`Beyond Imagination'

``The seriousness of such failures could be beyond the stretch of people's imagination,'' said Yu, a professor at the Institute of World Economics & Politics at the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences in Beijing. He didn't explain why he held that view.

China's government hasn't commented on Fannie and Freddie.

Yu is ``influential'' among government officials and investors and has discussed economic issues with Premier Wen Jiabao this year, said Shen Minggao, a former Citigroup Inc. economist in Beijing, now an economist at business magazine Caijing.

Investor confidence in Fannie and Freddie has dwindled on speculation that government intervention is inevitable. Washington-based Fannie has fallen 88 percent this year, while Freddie of McLean, Virginia, has slumped 91 percent.

Paulson got the power to make purchases of the two companies' debt or equity in legislation enacted July 30 that was aimed at shoring up confidence in the businesses. He has said the Treasury doesn't expect to use that authority.

The two companies combined account for more than half of the $12 trillion U.S. mortgage market.

Jim Rogers on the decline of the US and rise of China

A two part interview of Jim Rogers on Seek Alpha.
Interesting read:

Ex-BOE Official Slams Fed

Very interesting article on Bloomberg. Here are some quotes (emphasis added):
Aug. 24 (Bloomberg) -- Former Bank of England policy maker Willem Buiter sparked the biggest debate at the Federal Reserve's annual mountainside symposium, saying the central bank pays too much heed to the concerns of financial institutions.
``The Fed listens to Wall Street and believes what it hears,'' Buiter said yesterday in a paper presented to the Fed's conference in Jackson Hole, Wyoming. ``This distortion into a partial and often highly distorted perception of reality is unhealthy and dangerous.''
[...]
The steepest interest-rate cuts in two decades risk stoking inflation, while the Fed has been too generous in aiding banks, said Buiter, 58, a founding member of the Bank of England's independent rate-setting board in 1997.
[...]
Buiter said the Fed's emergency lending programs are too generous. The U.S. central bank is making up to $200 billion of its Treasuries holdings available to primary securities dealers, and $150 billion of funds through auctions to commercial banks. In addition, banks are able to borrow directly from the Fed.
``You don't let your borrower determine the value of the collateral offered to you,'' Buiter said. ``That's just crazy.''
[...]
Two economists echoed Buiter's concern in another paper presented yesterday, saying the Fed's program allowing institutions to swap Treasuries for mortgage bonds and other debt enables firms to ``window dress'' their balance sheets.
[...]
``Financial institutions can hold low-quality securities for the period where no reporting is required,'' wrote Franklin Allen of the University of Pennsylvania and the University of Frankfurt's Elena Carletti. ``Temporarily increasing the supply of Treasuries makes this kind of deception easier. It helps remove market and regulator discipline.''

2008-08-23

Problems with the [Lehman's] accounts were more serious than initially believed

AFP reports:
SEOUL (AFP) — South Korean banks led by Korea Development Bank (KDB) have shelved plans to buy a stake and management rights in Lehman Brothers due to concerns about its financial health, a report said Friday.

The state-run KDB and other banks were in talks with the major US investment bank until early August but negotiations failed at the final stage, the Chosun Ilbo newspaper said.

It said Lehman executives visited Seoul in June and initially sounded out the Korea Investment Corp. (KIC), a sovereign wealth fund which had earlier invested two billion dollars in Merrill Lynch.

After KIC decided not to proceed, the paper said, Lehman approached KDB chief Min Euoo-Sung, who had headed Lehman's local branch for three years until early this year.

Min initially pushed for the deal in cooperation with other local banks but backed out because the proposed takeover price was 50 percent higher than Lehman's book value, the daily said.

Problems with the accounts were more serious than initially believed, an unidentified government official was quoted as saying. "We concluded that it was too risky for KDB to take the deal."
Karl Denninger wrote about how the media have manipulated the markets on Friday, leading to another huge and useless rally.

2008-08-22

US Mint stops selling Gold coins

After having suspended, then rationed the selling of Silver coins in May 2008, the US Mint is now stopping (temporarily, it seems) the sale of Gold coins.

WSJ:
The government rationed food during World War II and gasoline in the 1970s. Now, it's imposing quotas on another precious commodity: 2008 dollar coins known as silver eagles.

The coins, each containing about an ounce of silver, have become so popular among investors seeking alternatives to stocks and real estate that the U.S. Mint can't make them fast enough. In March, the mint stopped taking orders for the bullion coins. Late last month, it began limiting how many coins its 13 authorized buyers world-wide are allowed to purchase.

This news is actually one week old, as reported here from GATA.org. Reuters is reporting it only now it seems:

"Due to the unprecedented demand for American Eagle gold one-ounce bullion coins, our inventories have been depleted. We are therefore temporarily suspending all sales of these coins," the U.S. Mint told authorized coin dealers in a memorandum dated on Friday.

The interesting thing is that the decline in the price of Gold create a huge demand for the physical. Why would the Mint stop selling the coins? Maybe because they know that's to good deal for their customers and a bad one form them? And would like to hold until the gold prices recover? In any way, this just sounds like market manipulation from the US Mint to me.

Caught in the Inflation-Deflation War

Adrian Ash from the BullionVault.com wrote an interesting article on the war between inflation and deflation that is currently going on. He doesn't pick any winner, and I think it is a reasonable stand.

I quite enjoyed this excerpt:
[...] in August last year, the Fed began slashing interest rates so low, so fast, the key Fed funds rate now sits 3.6% below the year-on-year rate of Consumer Price increases.

Sub-zero rates of return do not make for a bull run in cash. So if money itself becomes the only worthwhile asset to hold – as Richard Russell contends, even as cash-in-the-bank loses 3.6¢ of its value per year – then truly we're all freakin' doomed, along with the law of gravity and all logic.

2008-08-21

The US economy grinding to a halt

WASHINGTON (MarketWatch) - U.S. leading economic indicators fell 0.7% in July, pointing to "slow growth the rest of the year, and possibly an economy grinding to a halt," the Conference Board reported Thursday. "If there's a second-half recovery, it'll be the second half of 2009," said Ken Goldstein, labor economist at the private research organization. Five of the 10 indicators declined in July, led by building permits and stock prices. In the past six months, the leading index has fallen at a 1.8% annual rate, with seven of the 10 indicators falling over that period. The index was flat in June.

Write downs and capital raising up to the 20th of August

Bloomberg provides us this cool table:
Firm                                Writedown & Loss  Capital Raised
Citigroup Inc.* 55.1 49.1
Merrill Lynch & Co. 51.8 29.9
UBS AG 44.2 28.1
HSBC Holdings Plc 27.4 3.9
Wachovia Corporation 22.7 11.0
Bank of America Corp. 21.2 20.7
IKB Deutsche Industriebank AG* 15.1 12.5
Washington Mutual Inc. 14.8 12.1
Royal Bank of Scotland Group Plc 14.6 23.8
Morgan Stanley 14.4 5.6
JPMorgan Chase & Co.* 14.3 9.5
Deutsche Bank AG 10.6 3.2
Credit Suisse Group AG 10.4 2.7
Barclays Plc* 10.1 18.3
Wells Fargo & Company 10.0 4.0
Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. 8.2 13.9
Credit Agricole S.A. 7.9 8.7
Fortis 7.3 7.1
Bayerische Landesbank* 7.1 0.0
HBOS Plc 7.0 7.4
ING Groep N.V.* 6.8 4.7
Societe Generale 6.7 9.6
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce* 6.3 2.8
Mizuho Financial Group Inc. 5.9 0.0
National City Corp. 5.4 8.9
Indymac Bancorp Inc 4.9 0.0
Lloyds TSB Group Plc 4.9 4.9
WestLB AG 4.7 7.4
Dresdner Bank AG 4.0 0.0
BNP Paribas 3.9 0.0
Landesbank Baden-Wurttemberg 3.8 0.0
Goldman Sachs Group Inc. 3.8 0.6
E*TRADE Financial Corp. 3.6 2.4
Nomura Holdings Inc. 3.3 1.1
Natixis 3.2 6.6
Bear Stearns Companies Inc. 3.2 0.0
HSH Nordbank AG 2.7 1.9
Landesbank Sachsen AG 2.6 0.0
UniCredit SpA 2.5 0.0
Commerzbank AG 2.3 0.0
ABN AMRO Holding NV 2.3 0.0
Bank of China Ltd 2.0 0.0
DZ Bank AG 2.0 0.0
Fifth Third Bancorp 1.9 2.6
Bank Hapoalim B.M. 1.7 2.4
Rabobank 1.6 0.0
Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group 1.6 1.5
Royal Bank of Canada 1.5 0.0
Marshall & Ilsley Corp. 1.4 0.0
Alliance & Leicester Plc 1.3 0.0
U.S. Bancorp 1.3 0.0
Dexia SA 1.2 0.0
KeyCorp 1.2 1.6
Groupe Caisse d'Epargne 1.2 0.0
Hypo Real Estate Holding AG* 1.2 0.0
Sovereign Bancorp Inc. 1.0 1.9
Gulf International Bank 1.0 1.0
Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group 0.9 4.8
Sumitomo Trust and Banking Co. 0.7 1.0
DBS Group Holdings Limited 0.2 1.1
Other European Banks* 7.4 2.2
(not listed above)
Other Asian Banks* 5.5 7.8
(not listed above)
Other US Banks 2.9 1.9
(not listed above)
Other Canadian Banks 1.8 0.0
(not listed above)
________ ________
TOTAL 503.8 352.5

2008-08-17

Merrill, Goldman, next to buy their ARS back?

According to Bloomberg:
Aug. 15 (Bloomberg) -- New York State Attorney General Andrew Cuomo stepped up pressure on Merrill Lynch & Co. and Goldman Sachs Group Inc. to settle claims they misled investors in auction-rate securities
[...]
Merrill faces an ``imminent'' lawsuit from New York because the firm's offer last week to buy back $10 billion of the debt wasn't adequate, Cuomo said at a news conference today. New York has subpoenaed about 25 firms involved in sales of auction-rate securities, including five that have already settled. Merrill has five days to explain why the attorney shouldn't act, according to a letter from Cuomo's office.
OK, do you read this? Merrill offered to buy back for $10 billion, but that is not adequate!
I think we are not seeing the end of the liquidity nightmare banks are having and the Alt-A crisis is just a couple of months away.
In the meantime, the markets keep on rising. How long until reality struck them?

Dow Jones Indus and S&P 500 in $, € and Gold - Charts

S&P 500 (click on image for better view)

Dow Jones Industrial Average (click on image for better view)

These are the charts of the DJ INDU and the SP500 from the 15th of July 2008 to the 15th of August 2008 (closing prices) in terms of percentage change.

Check how the major US indices perform in terms of USD, EUR and XAU.

The question remains:
  • why would markets go up with the news that we are hearing?
  • what was/is over-valued: were the Euro and Gold over-valued? Or are the stocks and the USD over-valued?
Talk about over-valuation and irrational exuberance?

2008-08-16

US Banks reserves and borrowings update

I had already mentioned it a previous post on why this is the worst financial crisis in the known history, but here we are again, about 6 weeks later (why did it take so much time for the Fed to update their data? this is worrying!): the status of the banking system's reserve and borrowings.



2008-08-15

Wachovia to buy back $8.5 billion of auction-rate securities

After CitiGroup, UBS and Morgan Stanley, JPMorgan, it's now Wachovia's turn to buy back at face value the auction-rate securities it sold to clients for an amount of 8.5 billion USD. The full report is worth reading, specially regarding the timing and the type of investors who are impacted. It seems like Wachovia's balance sheet won't be affected before mid 2009, which also confirms that the whole banking mess is still far from over.
Wachovia currently estimates that the par value of ARS currently outstanding and eligible for purchase under the above offers totals approximately $8.5 billion
Next up, Merrill Lynch.

Sucker rally in the USD

All of the sudden, it seems to appear to many that the US dollar was oversold and that the Euro was over-valued. Even Mish - who I highly respect - keeps on insisting that the $ was supposed to rally - even though I never read anything about this rally on his blog before it actually happened.
  • Here, he dismisses Central Banks interventions and he says that Marc Faber weights in.
  • Here, he says that a fundamental change has occurred to justify the rally.
First, I don't think that we can dismiss interventionism and obscurantism from the Fed. Obviously, I don't have any proof of interventionism but only the longer term view will show if the rally was a real one or if it was just interventionism. I have no real opinion about that, but just can't think of dismissing it neither.

Then, I can't believe that Marc Faber was able to push the USD up 5-7% just by being bullish on it. During the same interview where he said he is bullish on the USD, he also said he is bearish on the US stocks. Did that sink the US indices into the abyss? It didn't even prevent the US stocks from rallying about 10% since mid-July! So this is dismissed as well.

Finally, what kind of fundamental change can be so sudden and violent?

What happened during the past few days? As expected, all the bad news are still piling up, companies are still announcing weaker and weaker results, the US consumer is still broke and homeless, inflation is rising (I need to put a post on my point of view about inflation) and - surprise surprise - the Eurozone's growth has been announced as negative.

Did anyone expect the Eurozone's growth to be positive? Did anyone expect the UE's growth to be positive? One must be blind to believe the official figures about the US gov about growth, and even blinder to think that with Spain, Ireland, France, Portugal, Greece in the UE, the UE will keep on growing...

Finally, I had written that a few days ago that Trichet was abandonning the war against inflation but:
  • If the Euro continues to collapse against the USD, inflation will rise further and Trichet will have to raise rates. The Eurozone is really lucky to have a real independent central bank, and not a for-profit, private, Central bank owned by the banking industry as in the US and UK. And the ECB only role is to keep a stable currency.
  • According to the two charts below, the M3 growth is declining quickly in the Eurozone while it is growing a lot faster in the US and the growth is stable. I think it is obvious where we are going from here...




I will publish a post about the inflation/deflation debate as well as I read many interesting things from both sides.

2008-08-14

JPMorgan to buy back $3 billion of auction-rate securities

After CitiGroup, UBS and Morgan Stanley, it is now JPMorgan's turn to buy back at face value the auction-rate securities it sold to clients for an amount of 3 billion USD:
NEW YORK (AP) -- JPMorgan Chase & Co. and Morgan Stanley on Thursday became the latest banks to reach settlements with New York Attorney General Andrew Cuomo and other regulators as part of a investigation into the collapse of the auction-rate securities market.
The pair of banks will repurchase a combined $7 billion in the troubled securities at face value from investors. Morgan Stanley agreed to pay a fine of $35 million, while JPMorgan will pay a fine of $25 million.
[...]
Like last week's settlements, JPMorgan and Morgan Stanley agreed to repurchase the securities, and will reimburse customers who sold their securities at a loss after the market collapsed in February.
JPMorgan will repurchase all securities it sold to retail customers, charities and small to mid-sized businesses by Nov. 12. JPMorgan will also buy back any securities sold by Bear Stearns, which it acquired earlier in the year.
JPMorgan's repurchase offer will cover $3 billion in auction-rate securities sold to about 10,000 customers.

More market rally

This Bloomberg article tells it all:
  • Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the largest sources of financing for U.S. home loans, each jumped more than 7 percent after the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association said larger loans financed by the two companies will be allowed in the main market for mortgage bonds.
  • PMI Group Inc., the second-biggest mortgage insurer, rallied 49 percent on plans to raise cash by selling businesses.
  • General Motors Corp. climbed the most in a month on falling oil prices and the automaker's plan to accelerate a cost-cutting program.
  • The S&P 500 Financials Index rallied 2.6 percent even after Morgan Stanley and JPMorgan Chase & Co. agreed to pay fines and buy back auction-rate securities that state regulators said were fraudulently sold to investors
  • An index of 15 homebuilders in S&P indexes rallied 4.4 percent.
  • GM had the steepest gain in the Dow, climbing 11 percent to $11.35.
  • Ford, the world's third largest automaker, increased 4.5 percent to $5.10.
  • Gannett Co. had the biggest gain in almost 21 years, climbing 11 percent to $21.31. The largest U.S. newspaper publisher plans to eliminate about 1,000 positions at its U.S. community newspapers as advertising sales continue to decline.
  • the Labor Department said consumer prices increased 0.8 percent in July, double the forecast of economists in a Bloomberg survey. So-called core prices, which exclude food and energy, advanced 0.3 percent last month, also more than projected.
  • First-time applications for jobless claims were 450,000 in the week ended Aug. 9 and the total number of people receiving benefits climbed to an almost five-year high.
  • Earnings have slumped 23 percent on average for the 438 companies in the S&P 500 that released second-quarter results since July 8, according to data compiled by Bloomberg.
  • Existing U.S. home sales fell 16 percent to a 10-year low in the second quarter and the median price for a single-family house dropped 7.6 percent
Basically, all the bankrupt companies soared, it seams like some people are trying to do some bottom fishing.

More on bottom fishing in another post.

2008-08-12

JPMorgan Loses $1.5 Billion Since July

Aug. 12 (Bloomberg) -- JPMorgan Chase & Co. will write down the value of mortgage-backed assets by at least $1.5 billion this quarter after credit-market turmoil and the U.S. housing slump deepened.

Trading conditions ``have substantially deteriorated'' since July, and ``sharply widened'' spreads on mortgage-backed securities and loans caused losses, the second-biggest U.S. bank by market value said in a regulatory filing late yesterday. Financial firms have reported more than $492 billion of losses and writedowns on debt securities since.
The Dow is up 10% since the mid-july bottom.
Oh, and Wachovia's loss is also widening since July:
Aug. 11 (Bloomberg) -- Wachovia Corp., the fourth-largest U.S. bank, said its second-quarter loss was bigger than reported in July because of costs to settle a probe of auction-rate securities sales. It also increased planned job cuts.

The bank revised the loss to $9.11 billion, or $4.31 a share, from $8.86 billion, or $4.20 a share, according to a regulatory filing today. The Charlotte, North Carolina-based bank now plans to dismiss 6,950 employees later this year, 600 more than previously disclosed. The new job cuts will come from Wachovia's mortgage operations, spokeswoman

UBS reports further writedowns of $5.1bn related to risky credit-related investments.

FT:
UBS, the biggest European casualty of the US credit crisis, on Tuesday announced a raft of measures to improve its performance as it reported widening losses and further writedowns of $5.1bn related to risky credit-related investments.
Bloomberg:
UBS Posts Loss, Doesn't Expect Improvement in `Adverse' Markets
By Elena Logutenkova
Aug. 12 (Bloomberg) -- UBS AG, Switzerland's biggest bank, reported a fourth straight quarterly loss on subprime-related writedowns and said it doesn't expect the ``adverse economic and financial trends'' to improve for the rest of the year.

The net loss was 358 million Swiss francs ($329 million) in the second quarter, compared with a 5.55 billion-franc profit a year before, Zurich-based UBS said today. Analysts surveyed by Bloomberg estimated UBS would post a loss of 281 million francs. About 3.8 billion francs in tax credits cushioned the loss.

Morgan Stanley to buy back $4.5 billion auction rate debt

After Citigroup, Merrill Lynch, and UBS, now is the turn of Morgan Stanley to buy its securities back:
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Morgan Stanley (NYSE:MS - News) said on Monday it will buy back about $4.5 billion of auction rate securities from clients at their face value, after New York Attorney General Andrew Cuomo's office said it wanted to begin settlement talks with the bank and two others.
According to the article, JPMorgan and Wachovia will follow?

2008-08-11

UBS to buy $18.6 billion in failed auction-rate securities

After CitiGroup and Merrill Lynch, Bloomberg reports that it is now UBS' turn to buy back a record 18.6 billion USD auction-rate securities:
UBS AG, Switzerland's biggest bank, agreed to pay $150 million in fines and begin buying back $18.6 billion in failed auction-rate securities, the largest settlement in a U.S. probe into whether banks stuck clients with hard-to-sell bonds.

2008-08-08

$ up 0.05 € in 24 hours as Trichet abandons war against inflation

The € trades at 1.50xx against the $ where it was trading at 1.55xx just 24 hours ago, before ECB's governor Trichet made a speech where he declared that he was basically done with tightening the rates.

With inflation hitting an almost all time high in July in the Eurozone at 4.1% while the ECB target is 2%, we can say that Trichet not only has failed since inflation is more than 100% higher than the target, but by announcing the end of the tightening, he, in my opinion, abandons war against inflation.

Fannie Mae loses $2.3B in quarter

Just a couple of days after the huge loss from Freddie, here's the results from Fannie:
WASHINGTON (AP) -- Mortgage finance company Fannie Mae swung to a second-quarter loss that was more than triple what Wall Street expected as conditions in the housing market continued to deteriorate.

The Washington-based company, the largest U.S. buyer and backer of home loans, said Friday it lost $2.3 billion, or $2.54 a share, for the quarter that ended June 30. The loss compares with profit of $1.95 billion, or $1.86 a share, in the period last year.

Analysts surveyed by Thomson Financial had expected a loss of just 68 cents a share.
Here's the details of the Freddie loss:
Freddie Mac reported its fourth consecutive quarterly loss, losing $821 million, or $1.63 per share, in the second quarter, down from a gain of $729 million, or 96 cents per share, a year earlier. The results missed analysts' expectations for a 54-cent-a-share loss.
Interestingly, these and all the other bad news don't seem to worry the markets, which prefer to focus on the declining price of oil as another good reason to rally.

Merrill will buy back its Auction-Rate Bonds as well

10 billion US$, face value (10 billion is 10 000 000 000)

Aug. 7 (Bloomberg) -- Merrill Lynch & Co. said it will offer to buy back about $10 billion in auction-rate securities from retail clients after Citigroup Inc. agreed to take similar steps under a settlement with U.S. and state regulators.

Merrill will pay face value for the securities, according to a statement today from the New York-based firm.

2008-08-07

Citi must buy back its auction rate securities!

According to Yahoo/Briefing.com:

Citigroup (C 18.91, -0.79) and the NY Attorney General have reached a multi-billion dollar agreement over allegations that Citi misled investors. The NY Attorney General said that Citigroup marketed auction rate securities as safe and cash-like investments, when in fact they had increasing liquidity risk.

Citi agreed to buy back all illiquid auction rate securities from Citi retail customers, charities and small to mid-sized businesses. The securities are worth more than $7 billion. Citi must also reimburse all retail investors who sold their auction rate securities at a discount.

Debt (Fiat) is Slavery; Gold is Freedom

Great article from Jean-Paul Rodrigue (17/10/2005), shameless copy-pasted:

We are getting towards the last mile (or 1.6 kilometer) of an experiment that began for the United States in 1913 with the creation of the Federal Reserve. To put a complex story simple, the dollar was gradually moved away from an asset (gold) based currency to a faith (fiat) based promise to pay which is likely not to be fulfilled. The last strike was done in 1971 when the dollar was finally disconnected from any restraint except the whims, greed and fears of a cabal of individuals operating obscurely, answering to just a few. Not many realize that placing the control of a currency in the hands of governments and Central Banks, which are simply tools of the State, is a process that is the cause of much distress for the average citizen even if the promise is always "price stability". Instead of having money being subject to market forces reconciling the interests of savers and borrowers, money is created out of "thin air", by dictat (this is where I think the creationist theory applies the most), and pumped into the economy by truckloads (and soon by helicopters). Where the money ends is often difficult to predict, but the outcome is always the same; inflation. The dirty little secret in front of everyone to see is that inflation is mostly the outcome of government policies of deficit spending (you will not find this in the great majority of economics textbooks). See inflation as the ultimate stealth confiscation of your wealth; the cleptocratic government is spending the newly created money first, which then seeps through the system. By the time it gets to you, your purchasing power has been reduced accordingly at the rate of 2 to 6% per year. It is a very old trick played by governments since they existed; the Romans and the Chinese emperors resorted to inflation to finance their bread and circus policies as do the fascist and socialist regimes of today. The outcome of such a game was always the same; the currency and often the empire eventually died as people lost trust in the promise to pay and saw the emperor as he truly was; naked. The challenge is to fool the population as long as possible in the vain hope that its faith in the fiat currency will endure. So why not "massage" inflation with a few hedonistic measures and account it in such a way that consumers are assumed not to be bothered by the constraints of eating, driving or paying a huge interest only adjustable rate mortgage.

Not entirely out of thin air however money comes from because fiat can only be created by debt, so the issue is to find ways to create debt that is sound enough to be repaid. Otherwise, your house of cards collapse and you fall victim to the horror of central bankers; deflation. This is where the potentially phantasmagoric financial world clashes with the economic reality; there must be some real economic output to pay back debt plus interest. Quite a system of checks and balances, like having two 500 pounds gorillas, one named asset and the other liability, balancing on a pole supported by a needle. Actually, you would like the pole to be very long so that the two gorillas do not see one another, scare the hell out of themselves on how unrealistically big they are and lose balance. With a very long pole, you could have one gorilla weighting only one pound and the other 1,000 pounds and still be in balance; we call this a fractional reserve system. Since one's asset is another liability in a fiat system, the rate of interest is the profit that financial institutions make by lending money issued by Central Banks at the dictated core rate. Thus taking money from the Central Bank at lets say 4% and lending it at 7% is a great carry trade as you get a profit of 3% for virtually doing nothing, except of having the privilege of being an intermediary that cannot be bypassed. You should thus not be surprised to receive so many credit card offers and pleas, if you own a house, to borrow against it, or if you go to any retail outlet, an amazing array of e-z financing. Corporations, such as GM, Ford or GE are more financial institutions than manufacturers these days. Get the house / car / vacation / flat screen TV you "deserve" now; you are entitled to it so they say. We are being flooded with liquidity and we live in an era of hyperinflation; the Greenspan Economy where the fruits of labor are virtually stolen. It is truly unbelievable that most people do not even realize it. We have asset bubbles all over (as the 1929 crash was, an outcome of the Federal Reserve monetary policies) and now the largest asset inflation in human history; the real estate bubble. Words and paradigms are invented to explain them, to hide their true source. Technology is a new paradigms justifying such high and "permanent" valuations (even if they have no assets or profits); you cannot lose investing in real estate.

Is there a way out of this spiral of devaluation and our constant strife to pull ourselves out of it? For most families, both spouses need to work to keep the balance sheet afloat. It is a sad realization that as long as money will be solely controlled by governments, the population will be held hostage to the fiscal (ir)responsibility of those who in theory should be protecting the fruits of our labors and savings. Even in a democratic society, the government cannot be trusted for such an honor system, even the best intentioned ones; they all eventually succumb to the temptation of spending more than they earn by using inflation to hide their Ponzi schemes. Democratic regimes may even be more vulnerable as the time span of elected officials is quite short, so decisions that can be seen damageable on the long term but perceived as beneficial (buying votes, approval, photo ops and names in concrete) on the short run will be made. It is however fascist regimes that have relied on fiat the most as democracy implies a level of accountability. A fiat currency system eventually creates a social dependency on debt which is a form of slavery. People become dependant on fiat generated handouts; the welfare state. The economy gradually hooks itself to government fiat-fed contracts allocated to the well connected first, which leads to misallocations of resources and even more government control like communism did not taught us an economic lesson on the horrors of central planning. The consumer, being fooled by asset inflation (especially in real estate), feels paper-wealthy and stop saving and contracts debt obligations that will likely take decades of lowered standards of living to pay back. The asset may deflate, but the debt remains the same (plus interest); you can be sure that this obligation will be well protected by law. Our monetary system thus needs an anchor more solid than the promise of governments and their central banks and far less corruptible and / or fallible. This anchor has always been there since the beginning of our monetary history.

Gold cannot be created out of thin air (only mined at great effort), cannot be faked, has no political ambitions; it does not care who owns it and for what purpose it is used for. It forces an efficient allocation of resources and accountability, because otherwise its owner gradually or suddenly loses his wealth. It is a store of value that is geographically and temporarily transmissible (try to use Yens to shop in Manhattan or try to spend some Confederate money in Atlanta). So, what one can do in the current situation? Fiat and its support structure are well established and will not go away. As the maxims say, you cannot fight the Fed and markets will remain illogical for longer than you can remain solvent. However, you can move away from fiat by getting rid of large quantities of it before its value whimpers away. The devaluation game will go on until its end, an unavoidable financial crisis that will not be inflated away which will mark the moment where fiat money will reach its intrinsic value; zero. It would be a good idea to own some gold (and silver); it is your ticket to freedom. It is an insurance against the short-sightedness of our ruling aristocracy, even those with the best of intentions (or at least full of promises for a better world for all of us if only they could have more power and money). Debt is the enemy of freedom.

The case against Gold

Everything is this great article.

2008-08-06

Morgan Stanley to advise on Freddie and Fannie capitalization with no access to the books

Karl Denninger points us to this new on Yahoo. Here's some quotes (unfortunately, this no joke):
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The Treasury said on Tuesday it hired Morgan Stanley (NYSE:MS - News) to advise it on whether housing finance giants Fannie Mae (NYSE:FNM - News) and Freddie Mac (NYSE:FRE - News) are adequately capitalized as the government tries to determine how it would use its new powers to support the two companies.
[...]
A Treasury spokeswoman said Morgan Stanley would not have access to Fannie's and Freddie's internal books in conducting its analyses.

2008-08-05

Fed Keeps Rate at 2% as Inflation Accelerates, Growth Stagnates

Bloomberg sums up the mega rally that occurred today.

Why are Gold and Oil down and $ up? That's the question that I would like to have answered :-)

2008-08-03

Indices PER update

I have talked about the indices PER just a few days ago, but with the quarterly reports published at the end of the week, we have reached another milestone:
The Dow Jones Industrials and the Russell 2000 have now negative EPS, which means that you cannot compute a PER for them...
At first I thought my numbers were wrong or that my spreadsheet was going postal, but the figures are confirmed by the WSJ (see screenshot below).



UK Landlords and market reality [update2]

Until a year ago, the housing market bubble fallacy was: "House prices never go down in London".

The current fallacy I hear everywhere in London is: "As people cannot afford to buy home anymore (as if they could afford it during the past 3-4 years in London...) rents are going up and it's a good time to by a buy-to-letter.

Well, I think it's time to get real. You cannot say "Real estate prices are going up, so we'll increase your rent" and then, one year later say "Real estate prices are going down, so rents are going up". This simply doesn't work.

Now, the news are starting to show how things are getting worse or worse as buy-to-letters start understanding what leverage means, having been hit by a very bad experience and having lost 90% of the equity they had as their deposit:
There are about one million buy-to-let loans in the UK but, worryingly, around 200,000 were taken out last year at the height of the boom.
Many of those were amateur investors acquiring their first buy-to-let property with no professional property experience.
After a decade of booming house prices it must have looked like a one-way route to riches.
But hey, don't forget, when you leverage, you can lose more than your equity, so soon, we'll see people who have lost 200% or 300% of their initial deposit...

Interestingly, this page from the FT shows the UK subprime market as well as the BTLers. They actually consider that areas with high BTL exposure is a risky area, as much as subprime. And guess which area is the most exposed to BTL? The first 8 eareas in the lest in terms of pourcentage of BTL are the 8 areas of London!

So why would BTL be considered as a reason to see further decline in the house prices? The answer is easy to guess, but the FT gives us the answer here:

Property owners unable to sell their homes are being pushed into the lettings market, but many are finding rents insufficient to meet their mortgage repayments.

Lettings agents said these “accidental landlords” were not only having to top up rental income from their own pockets, but were being forced to pay for renovations and safety checks to meet requirements.

With mortgage approvals at a record low, estate agents said even those sellers who cut asking prices by 20 per cent were still often unable to find a buyer.
[...]
This has led to a significant increase in the number of homes with both “to let” and “for sale” signs outside.

Hamptons International, which has seen a 44 per cent year-on-year rise in the number of properties available to rent, said the increased competition in the lettings market meant owners were having to spend more money repainting and renovating their homes to attract tenants.
So here it is: a lot of properties are coming on the letting market as well as the sales market. What does economy 101 says about demand/offer/prices?

Update:
Evening Standard is carrying this article: Buy-to-let landlords hit as rents fall by 20%

Update2:
Time Online is carrying this article: Repossessions rise 40% as mortgage arrears worsen

Housing repossessions rose by more than 40 per cent in the first three months of the year as the number of people in arrears on their mortgage payment soared to over 300,000.

Why this is the worst financial crisis since the 1900

I tightly monitor the "non borrowed reserves" data from the Fed just to have an idea of the current state of the banking system in the US, and I have already pointed to this graph before:



As you can see from this graph, the banking system is basically bankrupt since it had to borrow 160 billion USD as part of its reserves requirements.

But, now, if you take a look at this other graph:


You can see that the data start from approximately 1920, so contrary to the previous one, this one does contain the data of the 1929 krach. And, amazingly, as you can see, the 1929 didn't impact at all this borrowing figure, while the current crisis leads to vertical jump of about 160 billion USD. And even worse, the data has not been updated yet and is as of 1st of June 2008....

I can't wait to see the data for the 1st of July. It's as scary as the Magic Mountain's X...

Bernanke on Subprime on the 19 Jul 2007

"Some estimates are in the order of between $50 billion and $100 billion of losses associated with subprime credit problems."
Chairman Bernanke, July 19, 2007
Shamelessly copied from Calculated Risk :-)

Zimbabwe - inflation hits 15 000 000% and new currency

Just a couple of weeks after Zimbabwe introduced the 100 billion $ note, and have of course failed to tame inflation, they have decided to reevaluate their currency by 100 billion.

BBC carries two interesting articles with video footage (hidden cameras for security reasons) about what is going on in Zimbabwe.

These are definitely worth reading/watching:
What does a 15 000 000% mean?

The new Z$100bn (under $2, £1) note introduced last week is not enough to buy a loaf of bread.

A BBC reporter in Harare said that on the day he recently went shopping, a tray of 24 eggs went up from Z$375bn to Z$600bn.

Bear Market Rallies in 2000-2003

I was wondering if it was normal so see so many stupid rallies during the current market correction (krach yet to come?), so I dug just a few minutes on Yahoo Finance to see what happened during the krach of the Internet Bubble.

It is quite clear from these graphs that the long term trend was broken many times by rallies that drove the market up as high as 20% (or more on the Nasdaq Composite). So it looks like bottom fishing is a dangerous sport, specially when the market is only down about 15-20% for the all times high, and that many people are considering that this is biggest and most dangerous recession since the Great Depression.

Speaking of the great depression, I also dug a little bit that Krach, and one year after the Black Monday, the markets where down only by about 20-30%, while the correction unraveled, it took about 3 more years to hit the bottom which was 75-80% lower that the heights of 1929...